It is not unusual for users of a platform or of software to challenge the enforceability of a company's terms of use if they take issue with the company's product.
their own policies, their own user agreements required them to look and figure out what the facts were so that they could assess what was responsible and what was not responsible to post. i say that because it was incredibly important to insure people were getting realtime information as possible but also ones that really demonstrated what all of us need, rather than where and how we should ascribe blame or where and how we should consider who benefits and who doesn t because we were all harmed. but i say this in part because it was a social media platform themselves that reached out to government agencies including health and human services and cdc to get that information, and under the vacated opinion, really important to understand it has been vacated by the fifth circuit. the preliminary injunction on all the instances we re talking about because because one of the things it would do in my