The filing responsibility is on the commissioner who did the recuse recusal. Right. Im thinking would there be some accountability that this person has recused him or herself and they filed this form. So should the Actual Department of the commission be notified . They would be aware of the actual recusal because it occurred that it occurred prior to the filing requirement. The filing requirement is a requirement imposed by the Ethics Commission. So i dont know that that would be something that they would be looking to ensure that its because the responsibility is actually on the commissioner who recused themselves. But there is again, in the public environment, you know, a department could they wouldnt actually receive notice from this process, but if they wanted to check that it happened, they could do that. Or implement another process where the commissioner had to bring a copy. But i think that would be a protocol that would have to be enforced at the commission level, that the com
Recusal. Right. Im thinking would there be some accountability that this person has recused him or herself and they filed this form. So should the Actual Department of the commission be notified . They would be aware of the actual recusal because it occurred that it occurred prior to the filing requirement. The filing requirement is a requirement imposed by the Ethics Commission. So i dont know that that would be something that they would be looking to ensure that its because the responsibility is actually on the commissioner who recused themselves. But there is again, in the public environment, you know, a department could they wouldnt actually receive notice from this process, but if they wanted to check that it happened, they could do that. Or implement another process where the commissioner had to bring a copy. But i think that would be a protocol that would have to be enforced at the commission level, that the commissioner belonged to the Planning Commission in this case. The form
A 572000000. 00 fine for its role in the states Opioid Crisis Cleveland County district judge that baldwin had this to say about the ruling. If you are trying to this is an imminent danger and this too is loehmanns my judgment includes findings of fact lucians along the state met its burden. Johnson and johnson and johnsons misleading marketing and promotion of a few is created a distance as defined by studio as section one including. Those actions compromised health and safety of thousands of homes. Following the ruling the pharmaceutical promised to appeal i mean that the company did not cause a Public Health epidemic in the state for more details on this procedure in setting ruling and what it means for johnson and johnson and overall opioid up a demick we are fortunate to be joined by molly barrows contributor at americas lawyer now molly what does this mean for the fight against Opioid Epidemic moving forward is this is a good person as it seems. Absolutely its a huge deal for so
Rainforest over 900000 human beings whose home culture and way of life is threatened by greed and politics and the Mainstream Media only seeming to take interest in the amazon amazonia when it was a chance to lob insults at trumper bolsa nor oh all those who have been in this fight for longer than this years dry season are pointing out the obvious that the story of these fires began centuries ago as nicole froyo of zora magazine wrote as we move forward on the subject of Climate Change especially in the amazon we must remember this is a fight that amazon ik Indigenous People have been fighting since 1500 when the portuguese landed in brazil. So lets take a step into the future as we refuse to repeat the sins of our colonizing past and start watching the hawks. Are still killing. The bears like you are real the islamists are liars to keep the ball out of touch with the day like you let down our guard. The police. Would. Be. Here to tell. Everybody to watch in hoxton top of the wallet an
Recusal. Right. Im thinking would there be some accountability that this person has recused him or herself and they filed this form. So should the Actual Department of the commission be notified . They would be aware of the actual recusal because it occurred that it occurred prior to the filing requirement. The filing requirement is a requirement imposed by the Ethics Commission. So i dont know that that would be something that they would be looking to ensure that its because the responsibility is actually on the commissioner who recused themselves. But there is again, in the public environment, you know, a department could they wouldnt actually receive notice from this process, but if they wanted to check that it happened, they could do that. Or implement another process where the commissioner had to bring a copy. But i think that would be a protocol that would have to be enforced at the commission level, that the commissioner belonged to the Planning Commission in this case. The form