iraqi brothers in the fight but report back to our national security apparatus to tell them what is going on. they will provide very good intelligence. they will provide support to the iraqi forces in whatever groups they are assigned by and it s usually a 12-person detachment, but they are also going to provide psychological support for the operation. and that s got to be incredibly important, just for a moral boost to have the presence of highly trained operators from the united states amidst these iraqi forces. that seems like one of the issues here, i don t know if it s in the office core or below, but you have iraqis who not even, you know, engage in a fire fight but before isis even showed uptaking up weapons, taking off their uniforms, throwing down guns. so a moral boost you can t under estimate how important that could be. anderson, i was listening to
there that is distinguishable. we re three women here. we have all gotten our share of angry comments, angry tweets that have a sexist and violent that is true. but the question is why discuss and i think everybody on the panel is all for discussion about the problems that women legitimately face, especially violence against women and threatening behavior. the question is the linking here, dana. exactly. it seemed to be as a launch pad and i don t maybe it began with good intentions, megyn, i m not sure but when i was reading through it, it seemed to end uptaking a mocking tone. i m sitting here reading tweets from women saying i didn t get promoted but i don t like the word man in management [ overlapping speakers ] the harsh tag. ridiculousness, as well. the things that i have seen
these crimes, he put stuff out there that is distinguishable. we re three women here. we have all gotten our share of angry comments, angry tweets that have a sexist and violent that is true. but the question is why discuss and i think everybody on the panel is all for discussion about the problems that women legitimately face, especially violence against women and threatening behavior. the question is the linking here, dana. exactly. it seemed to be as a launch pad and i don t maybe it began with good intentions, megyn, i m not sure but when i was reading through it, it seemed to end uptaking a mocking tone. i m sitting here reading tweets from women saying i didn t get promoted but i don t like the word man in management [ overlapping speakers ] the harsh tag. ridiculousness, as well. the things that i have seen
schools. when i asked the superintendent about this, he told me this, quote, ve have to way budgetary issues as well as where the threats might present themselves. when the threat presented itself here at this elementary school yesterday, here is how the shooter got inside. they have security here. tlp are double doors here to get in. you either have to have a security card for the card reader here or you have to push the button or be visually identified and somebody talks to you. what the shooter did here was he waited for someone with a card or to be buzzed in to go in through these doors and before it closed he grabbed the door and went in straight to the office where he ended uptaking the officer workers hostage. now after all that happened he exchanged gunfire with police. you can see this window was brown out by gunfire and the one next to it, the where you know over here. this one was blown out by gunfire and take note up here.
like this. did you notice any blood on him? yes. where did you notice blood? down his nostrils and both sides of his lips. could you tell whether there was any damage to his nose? no. did you see some blood on h back of his head? yes. sir, did you end uptaking some photographs using your cell phone? yes. did you take a photograph of the back of his head? yes. did you take a photograph of the person you now know has been identified as trayvon martin on the ground? yes. did you also take a photograph of a flash flight that was on the ground? next to the body, yes. okay. i apologize.