as to how this occurred involved the neighbor, mr. tate. he was mentally ill. i m done talking to you. and, according to the defense, dangerous, too. the defense then hammered home the portrayal of the unpredictable neighbor by using todd s own complaint summary from that day. you re in the awkward situation of being their best witness. right. you believed he could become a danger. anyone who should respond to that residence again should use extreme caution. that is correct, i did. the defense theorized that tate entered the trailer through an unlocked door and shot lisa for revenge. the key defense evidence that suggested an intruder was a stray peanut butter-and-jelly sandwich, in a baggie, left on the back deck. there was a sandwich that would not have been there the night before that was there. critters should have devoured it, he argued. he told the jury it must have been the killer s snack. i believe it to be the most compelling piece of evidence in the whole ca
cyberhygiene. apply your security patches. back up your systems. the reason it s so important to apply security patches is because security researchers have identified vulnerabilities, basically identified in your house let s say an open window, unlocked door and basically saying a private patch is closing up the avenues where the attacker can get in. also if you back up your systems if you get hit with the ransomware attack very likely you can reconstitute the network without paying the ransom. i don t believe in paying the ransom. but in some cases i understand businesses have had to make the business decision. is it more costly to reconstitute the network and start from scratch and pay the ransom? unfortunately some businesses had to make the decision to pay the ransom. we know that the paying of the ransom promotes more of the ransomware hacks. before we let you go we know that fbi director christopher wray singled out the russians. and talked about specifically allowing the hack
one moment in time, and then any of the variables that were the collective catalyst for what we saw on january 6th aren t present today, that you don t have the president saying the election was stolen, that there isn t the social media element from these small groups, that you don t have people in congress egging them on. all the elements that led to january 6th are in place today. such a great point. this just into cnn, facebook says former president, donald trump, will not be allowed back on its platforms until january 27, 2023. that s two years from the date he was suspended following the january 6th capitol riot. let s bring in cnn chief correspondent brian stelter. explain how they re explaining this decision. they say, okay, we heard the oversight board, we want rules and now we re putting rules in place. they say president trump s conduct up to january 6th was so irresponsible that a two-year ban is appropriate. then the window opens and he could be back again, with plent
yes. reporter: an unlocked door. opportunity for her killer to enter and wait. on the stand, carol s mother, ruth kennedy, had to relive that very last phone call with her daughter. how exactly did it end so abruptly? she told the sheriff s department operator that carol had screamed oh, no. and you just said that, oh, no a certain way with a certain emphasis, was that the way that she said it to your recollection? she said, oh, no. basically, that s the way it came out. did she scream then? it really was not a scream. i m sure it was because i was so rattled myself. she just said, oh, no that s all she said and basically in that tone of voice, like it was more dismay. reporter: this was very difficult for ruth, as you can imagine.
things that she did when she came home from work? she did. she typically went for a run maybe four days a week out on the backland. and to your recollection, did she leave the door unlocked when she would do that? yes. reporter: an unlocked door. opportunity for her killer to enter and wait. on the stand, carol s mother, ruth kennedy, had to relive that very last phone call with her daughter. how exactly did it end so abruptly? she told the sheriff s department operator that carol had screamed oh, no. and you just said that, oh, no a certain way with a certain emphasis, was that the way that she said it to your recollection? she said, oh, no. basically, that s the way it came out. did she scream then? it really was not a scream. i m sure it was because i was so rattled myself. she just said, oh, no that s all she said and basically in