become even more important to that individual. we have all experienced it in our lives. and for him to kind of almost as if he was shifting gears, while he was speaking without really having any real emotional traumatic connection until it just again it didn t feel genuine. nancy: okay, guys, before we go do break, i want to hear the kennel video. murdaugh had no idea his voice was caught on the video. and he doesn t find out until months pass, and his son paul s phone is unencrypted. they finally get this video. and there he is. at the murder scene. cut 21.
become even more important to that individual. we have all experienced it in our lives. and for him to kind of almost as if he was shifting gears, while he was speaking without really having any real emotional traumatic connection until it just again it didn t feel genuine. nancy: okay, guys, before we go do break, i want to hear the kennel video. murdaugh had no idea his voice was caught on the video. and he doesn t find out until months pass, and his son paul s phone is unencrypted. they finally get this video. and there he is. at the murder scene. cut 21.
be charged with. doj has methods which they can obtain communication. we have seen that. the way that they have gone about getting cell phone data, showing where people are located. the way they used facial recognition in some cases. there s a lot of information doj can obtain. they can go to google to show where your phone was on that day or get your messages if they are unencrypted. there s a lot of ways they could match that up with what the individuals told congress. i think there s this interplay, tension but also interplay between the doj investigation and the congress investigation. we see during sentences, doj were the judges credited people who testified before the committee. that s been a benefit for defendants who have actually gone to the committee and testified. that s been something that their defense attorneys have brought up and gave that as credit. there s a lot of interplay between this investigation and it will be interesting to see
mr. lindell said he had 37 terabytes. of irrefutable data or the proof, he said, which is visible in intercepted network data, or pack it, that it could be unencrypted to reveal a cyber attack occurred and votes were switched. but cyber expert josh merritt, on the team hired by mr. lindell to interrogate date for the symposium, told the washington times that the captures are unrecoverable in the data provided by mr. lindell, and that the data cannot prove a cyber incursion. so our team said, we re not going to say this is legitimate if we don t have confidence in the information. mr. merritt told the washington time on wednesday, the second day of the symposium. if you are someone confidently
that the theory is illegitimate. mr. lindell said he had 37ter bytes. the proof, he said, is visible in intercepted network data, or pack it, that it could be unencrypted to reveal a cyber attack occurred and votes were switched. but cyber expert josh merit, on the team hired by mr. lindell to interrogate date for the symposium, told the washington times that the captures are unrecoverable in the data provided by mr. lindell, and that the data cannot prove a cyber incushion. so our team said, we re not going to say this is legitimate if we don t have confidence in the information. mr. merritt told the washington time on wednesday, the second day of the symposium.