and you haven t added much to the discussion in your papers as to the errors that casey made other than i disagree with casey. justice sotomayor maybe i can highlight, too. casey gave one paragraph to the workability of roe. it then adopted the undue burden standard the most unworkable standard in american law and three paragraphs to reliance which doesn t account for the last 30 years and the changes that occurred since casey. it gave a brief factual view to things that have changed since roe. those are not going to take account of the last 30 years of advancements in medicine, science and all of those things. what are the advancements in medicine. an advancement in knowledge and concern about such things as fetal pain and very human
central holdings. second casey and roe were correct. for a state to take control of a woman s body and demand that she go through pregnancy and childbirth with all the physical risks and life altering consequences that brings is a fundamental deprivation of her liberty. preserving a woman s right to make this decision until viability protects her liberty while logically balancing the other interests at stake. third, eliminating or reducing the right to abortion will propel women backwards. two generations have now relied on this right and one out of every four women makes the decision to end a pregnancy. mississippi s ban would particularly hurt women with a imagine or health or life change during the course of a pregnancy. poor women who are twice as likely to be delayed in accessing care and young people