the immunizations? it s a perfectly appropriate role for the government, the state government level because they are the ones that have the public health responsibility to determine whether or not immunizations are required and whether it s growing kids or if there is an outbreak of an infectious disease and whether or not an immunization ought to be required. sharon carb in is a semi retired tax attorney from pennsylvania. parsec tear pri>parse secretas will receive tax credits if it is repealed. are you willing to benefit all americans and not just the
many americans behind. that would pull the rug out from under americans. we believe it s important to make certain every american has access to coverage that is affordable and provides choices for patients and incentivizes innovation. if you just simply repeal it, that doesn t get to that goal. the individuals that talked about their insurance going away either on medicaid or through the private sector, they would lose out. they would have the rug pulled out from under them. that s not what we want. it s most important and the president is strongly in favor of this and heard about it all the time on the campaign trail that repeal and replace was what the american people desired. can i follow-up on the sentiment that i m sure you are hearing. one is mo brooks. your plan is the largest welfare program sponsored by republicans
the commission is reportedly preparing to unveil is plan that could include cutting social security benefits or raising the retirement age to 70 or maybe both. if the debt commission recommends that the age goes up for social security or means testing or cutting benefits, even if it is for under americans under a certain age, would you ve vote against those recommendations? let me just address what mr. cantor just talked about because their proposal for social security reform and entitlement reform with medicare is to privatize social security and i m not going to debate his colleague paul ryan. don t. eric, i did not interrupt you. excuse me. congress woman, go ahead. i politely listened to you. air iraq and his colleagues proposed private sizing social
without taking a vote on whether to extend the bush era tax cuts? i think it was disgusting that the republicans held the middle class tax cuts hostage and the obsession with providing tax breaks to the wealthiest 2% of americans. we could have voted on making the middle class tax cuts and tax cuts for working families permanent had the republicans not insistd that the only way they would support those tax breaks is if we also added $700 billion to the deficit to give tax breaks to the wealthiest 2% of americans. that is what was really disturbing. bret: your response? last word, congressman. they are in complete control. it was a bipartisan majority that felt we out not put taxes on anybody in a recession. and the question about $700 million. and you would have voted just for middle class tax breaks? the proposal by the white house is a $400 billion cause. we know what the numbers are. they are in complete control. we doll well in november. they turned their backs on
took us a long time to get out of where we are right now. and the damage left by the recession is so deep that it is going to take a long time to get out. this is not what americans asked for when they sent then senator obama to be our president in the oval office. and the pink slips shouldn t be going to workers here in ohio, they should be going to the members of president obama s economic team. bret: president obama and house minority leader john boehner reacting to off unemployment numbers. the unemployment rate remains at 9.6% and in the month of september the economy lost a total of 95,000 jobs. and as foreclosures are on the rise across the country a number of banks and lenders have put a freeze on moving bad home loans into foreclosure. here is what the new york times editorial board said about the unemployment report, the