say publicly that they do accept it. but it is more important that we actually get to the truth and tell the american people because the majority of the american people actually believe that what happened on january 6th was a tragedy for our democracy and they want accountability for it. there are people who are telling the truth and there s a headline in buzzfeed , prosecutors and judges really don t want you to call capitol rioters tourists. they write, i m especially troubled by the accounts of some members of congress that january 6th was just a day of tourists walking through the capitol. that s from u.s. district judge royce lamberth. i don t know what planet they were on. frank figliuzzi, does this make a difference? does the fact that you have people who are unbiassed in this, who are looking at the facts of the case, does that have any sway? i m beginning to think that
entering the final stages. 2.1 million ballots examined by hand with only braille ballots left to count but the process is plagued by questions of transparency and bizarre tactics from the beginning. the latest controversy, a wi-fi router attached to audit servers potentially compromising the data of voters. now a growing list of arizona republicans say they have had enough and the next guest is one of them writing the audit is now hurting the party. i don t believe it will now convince anyone who isn t already convinced that the lest was stolen or that the election was unbynesed. conservative talk show host mike broomhead joins me now. thank you for joining the show. you first supported the audit and now against it. why has your position changed? i think that they lost focus on being fair and unbiassed. they have allowed it to turn into a biassed audit speaking to
unbiassed election workers dedicated to the process and not an outcome. across the country we see people not only starting the audits but running for positions to do the bidding of the big lie and most americans just don t understand that this is happening. so the ones that are being told by stacey abrams, who are being informed about the new limitations, yes, it is likely to spur new turnout but on the whole the fact that they are not able to stop the steal to perfect the steal for 2022 and 2024 is lost on most of america. to your point, a.b. there s new reporting in politico that the republicans are now running for these offices, for this secretary of state spot. politico is writing republicans who sought to undercut or overturn president biden s election win are launching campaigns to become the state s top election officials.
the vaccine stake holders made a great gamble. that the epidemic will be closed out with the vaccine alone. the cdc needs to have an external, unbiassed event committee and monitoring committee as in any clinical investigation. laura: the cdc director walensky is encouraging pregnant women to get vaccinateed. we have no reason to suspect that the vaccines result in any infertility now or in the future. we have no reason to believe that getting vaccinated will change your menstrual cycle. there are decades of research
he loved this country and was worried about the pillars of our democracy and what was happening to it. he would view this as another warning sign of what was happening and try to get people to pay attention and understand their governments in all of our hands. let me switch gears and get your thoughts on impeachment while we have you, if i may. speaker pelosi delaying sending over the articles of the impeachment do you agree with that decision? are you at all concerned that it delays the process in a way that it could potentially backfire? first of all, people don t really talk about precedence and the fact of the matter that bill clinton was, by a republican congress, was impeached december 19th and the managers weren t appointed until january 6th. i think we ve already heard some senators, which you have in the heard in previous even in the richard nixon days say i m not going to be unbias sed.