the whole downtown of fort lauderdale and really appearing like, um, like people just were born expecting in the water to get that deep that quick. we re just you can see some of the video that that you took as well. i mean, it s pretty incredible seeing all those those cars being washed away. i mean, even though they were getting warnings. a lot of people seem to disregard those warnings and we re driving into the water. yeah i wasn t a little surprised by some people . i think some people were trying to charge through it. but yeah, it s never wise because you never know how deep the water is, and it can very quickly a dangerous and you could drown. brie easily. um so , yeah, i was out and about, um, walking around just seeing if there were any people that needed help and dire need, and thankfully, i didn t run across anybody that did need help as far as life threatening or anything. yeah i m just
individuals, co workers? supervisors etcetera, and again ? we just don t know what exactly is happening here. um, you know, was this a some sort of, you know, mishandled termination. um so, but investigators that s what they re looking for. they re going to really hone in on, you know what was this type of grievance and was there any type of what investigators in law enforcement refer to as concerning communication in advance of this attack that you know, we should have acted upon again a lot. we don t know what we do know, because this follows the same pattern of, you know, sort of the formula for these types of attacks. it puts law enforcement investigators on the right track to really under understand what was the motive, an answer why this tragic event happened and they re starting to head down that road. fourth that fuller investigation now, jonathan, thank you. as always. we appreciate that. so we re going to continue to follow this for dead. the shooter dead as well. has a conne
audience rules changes needed a rules. change is needed to reinstate jones this evening and you want to see him reinstated. you saw the divide. it was along party lines. so you think that the republican leaning members will vote for jones to be reinstated. um so, um, but the state legislature has about three or four weeks left before they adjourned for the summer. we um or we very much want that district district 52 to be represented, and so the way to do that is to immediately about someone and put them back in and he used to choice. so i think what will happen? hopefully today is example happened and no one we won t have any objections and we will be able to move properly and send him right back. so let s just say you re optimistic about it. but what if the measure to reinstate him fails? what recourse do you have left this and what recourse is he have to regain his seat, if
destroy america. justice is not treating president trump blindly they re treating president trump has somebody else say it again wanted dead or alive. it looks pretty political. so without seeing the indictment without knowing anything behind it. the motivation was there long before the evidence was the case. and then what changed? doesn t trump announces he s running for president. sam. joining us now is cnn political director and host of cnn political briefing podcast. they have a challenge and cnn senior political commentator and former senior adviser to former president obama. david axelrod. good morning, guys. um so, david, this david david to my right. it. it s notable. that s what republican lawmakers think hutchinson who are going to have on next hour, who s running for the gop nomination, is one of the few republicans not to jump on the bandwagon in that respect, but when you ask the voters what they think morality actually do think that president trump should postpone his
on a beginner ski slope, causing him to suffer quote a brain injury, four broken ribs and other serious injuries. but paltrow alleges that sanderson hit her and she is counter suing him for her legal fees. i m back with my panel. um so, ellie, how do you? how are you going to determine as a lawyer or a jury who ran into whom? on a ski mountain in 2000? i think this was 16. it s a straight up factual issue for the jury. they ll testify about what happened. i don t imagine there s surveillance but i don t listen. i ve never skied in my life. i m proud to say admission. i don t think i ever will. but i don t know or do they are their surveillance videos of skiing. there could be witnesses, witnesses, and you just decide who was in the wrong. i guess there s there were witnesses. certified in this case, we re going to testify. they were witnesses right? and i guess there s rights of way who s going to fast and who s away? are they that kind of thing? but let s talk about that, aren t you?