Three distinct art exhibitions, each weaving narratives of resilience, feminine perspectives, and traditional roots represent Karachi's thriving cultural tapestry
The FBI agent managing the team on the Hunter Biden criminal case testified to the House Judiciary Committee that US Attorney David Weiss had ultimate authority over the case, contesting testimony brought forward by whistleblowers.
wouldn t allow them to get search warrants, for instance of hunter biden s locker or joe biden a cab-in on his property where hunter biden was living. david weiss, we were told by the attorney general, had full authority. well, they say ultimate authority about where and when to bring charges. but i think that again they are using lawyer speak because it looks as if ultimate authority is not the same as complete or full authority. david weiss has what he has said about how much authority he had conflicts with what both the attorney general said and also what the i.r.s. whistleblower said. i think it s important that he come before the house and testify, alongside those irs whistleblowers and others in the meeting where he said he was powerless to bring these charges. bill: it looks like the dates available will be in the fall and i think that s kind of when
he had ultimate authority, including responsibility for deciding where, when, and whether to file the charges. so if there s any end security, it has got to go to david weiss, the donald trump handpicked attorney. can i say something real quick? i have two things i wanted to bring up. there are a lot of different tax cases out there that include misdemeanors and felonies. lots of different reasons why we charge of a felony. but i want to be clear on this, that when you have a felony charge with a misdemeanor that you have to charge the felony. in this case, they did not charge that felony. one more point to this. we had a meeting with you have to charge that felony. that is a department of justice rule? that is in the manual, that you have to charge the felony. you are saying whether or not the evidence supports it?