Decade doing trumps dirty work. Credibility issues are why the prosecution used the 20 witnesses who proceeded cohen to basically corroborate his story before they even put him on the stand. It is also why trumps defense team has singlemindedly sought to state their case on discrediting him. Even in cases that might not be read crucial to rebutting the prosecution. For that reason the defense may think they racked up a victory for themselves today because during the crossexamination this morning, cohen admitted that he stole from the trump organization. In addition to the reimbursement for the hush money for stormie daniels, cohen was also given 50,000. That money was supposed to be a repayment for what cohen spent to hire a tech from to rig an online poll on trumps behalf. We dont have time to get into that detail. But as cohen said on the stand, he only paid trump 20,000 and kept the rest for himself. Asked point blank today whether he stole from the trump organization, cohen said, y
a few hours on sunday doj takes that back. he says no, that s not what we meant. we do want him to go before the oversight committee. we want devon archer to talk then he needs to serve his time. will: gregg jarrett was on the show earlier and he said this game the doj played over the weekend amounts to object destruction of justice. the doj and fbi forbid irs investigators from examining the evidence of bribery, pursuing it. they couldn t even ask any questions about the big guy or joe biden that strikes me as obstruction of justice by the department of justice. it s corrupt so no wonder they have been very anxious to keep devon archer from testifying. he has the ability to blow the lid off of joe biden s phoney claims of innocence. so you are seeing obstruction and a cover-up by u.s. attorneys, department of justice, fbi. what they re really doing is trying to protect joe biden. will: the room is full of
biden spoke to hunter but it wasn t about that or do they really have a good idea of what he will say in. i think they have a pretty good idea. based on what his attorney has told them. you know, he has the ability to blow the lid off of joe biden s phony claims of innocence. so you are seeing obstruction and a cover-up by u.s. attorneys, department of justice, fbi, what they re really doing is trying to protect joe biden. you know, his son is running this multi million dollars foreign influence peddling schemes but, you know, dad was the key player. joe biden held the power. he is the one who had the ability to we would his influence and, you know, the burisma scan, both devon archer and hunter biden sat on the board and made a load of money. that s a prime example. you know, there s an email in november of 2015 in which a top burisma executive demands the bidens use their influence to
attorney in delaware in our investigation was constantly ham strung, limited and marginalized by d.o.j. ovation eaves as well as other u.s. attorneys. i still think a special counsel is necessary for this investigation. bill: he said it emphatically. do you think it will happen? doesn t appear likely. not under the biden administration, certainly not under the current d.o.j. they have are treating bidens different than every other american. unimpeachable about these witnesses, they have had access to hunter biden s financial records and bank records. they weren t testifying about things they heard or should have investigate. they have done the investigation. they had the facts, the information and the transactions and they were also relating to us conversations they themselves had had with the department of justice attorneys, u.s. attorneys. they weren t talking about things they heard second or third hand. this is hard evidence of interference by the department
mean? if you are in charge of an investigation and you need assistance from fellow u.s. attorneys, you don t ask for permission, you say hey, we are working together now, congratulations. you don t have to wait for them to say no, that s not really how it works. but that s how allegedly it worked in this case. molly: i think you clarified where i was going with the next question, miranda devine, this is a quote, the most serious charges in the hunter biden case were dead in the water because weiss did not have the authority to charge them let alone ultimate authority. but there delves into the crafted semantics from the responses, accusing weiss of putting forward this convoluted hypothetical, noting that weiss writes he may request special status, not that he did. what do you make of the word games going on here? i think it s definitely a word game. look, this whole thing happened