domestic security remit under one cabinet official. we never had something like this before as a country. something much more like havg a home secretary in britain or in lots of other countries they call somebody in this position the minister of the interior. we ve never had something this overarching in terms of domestic security. but because this kind of job is specifically a domestic job focused on things that happen at home, focused on things that happen at homeland as we ve all learned to be comfortable saying. one thing that you see around the world in democratic countries that have this kind of position is when you have a home secretary type position or you have a minister of the interior type position in democracies all around the world, one hallmark of that type of government position is that it is not held by somebody from the military. because democracies don t use their militaries on their own soil, right? democracies don t use their militaries to control their own people.
one thing that you see around the world in democratic countries that have this kind of position is when you have a home secretary type position or you have a minister of the interior type position in democracies all around the world, one hallmark of that type of government position is that it is not held by somebody from the military. because democracies don t use their militaries on their own soil, right? democracies don t use their militaries to control their own people. they don t use military force for domestic security. in democracies you don t want the military becoming a political weapon used at home by the nation s leader. you don t want the military becoming a separate political actor on their own terms with their own designs on domestic power, like egypt or the military took over after democracy had picked a bad leader. for all those big picture civics reasons, military leaders all
one thing that you see around the world in democratic countries that have this kind of position is when you have a home secretary type position or you have a minister of the interior type position in democracies all around the world, one hallmark of that type of government position is that it is not held by somebody from the military. because democracies don t use their militaries on their own soil, right? democracies don t use their militaries to control their own people. they don t use military force for domestic security. in democracies you don t want the military becoming a political weapon used at home by the nation s leader. you don t want the military becoming a separate political actor on their own terms with their own designs on domestic power, like egypt or the military took over after democracy had picked a bad leader. for all those big picture civics reasons, military leaders all over the world are kept pretty deliberately separate and apart
he had undergone several hundred hours of training and it was certified, a reserve deputy officer is different from a regular deputy with the sheriff s department. in many states these programs exist, it s it almost seems more like an honorary type position. there are questions as to why a reserve deputy could have been in a situation like this. however, the sheriff s department says that this is standard in the way these operate. there are doens dozens that help out regular deputies in the sheriff s department and this is not unusual for them to be in these type of situations. there s a great deal of, you know, depending on whether or not the shooting shouldn t have happened sheriff deputy s say it is standard and bob bates the reserve deputy has basically had the function and ability to work like any other deputy within the sheriff s department. a lot of questions swirling around that. and the sheriff s department says that essentially bob bates
stay in a state that costs too much and the burden is on the company of staying if business or going out of business so they go to low-cost areas where they can afford to stay in business. a lot of them go to lower tax environments like where? florida, you have texas. you mean over the last decade us states with no income taxes nearly doubled their population. states that really tax people like the ultra liberal states, new york, chicago, and also california, those states practice obamanomics. but they re in declining numbers. i wonder whether the companies have an added benefit. they talk about the effect of taxes but if you move a lot of midlevel type position to say these states you don t have to pay them as much. it s also in the company s interest. absolutely, companies are