Sunday nights at 8 00 eastern on cspans q and a. Next a hearing on carcinogens and methods for detecting as best us and talcum powder. The subcommittee heard from scientists, a doctor and patient after the fda said it found trace amounts of as best us in baby powder. Johnson johnson recall but its tests found no carcinogens. The hearing is an hour and a half. [inaudible conversations] the subcommittee will come to order. Without objection the chair is authorized to declare recess at any time. I welcome myself for five minutes to have an Opening Statement. On october 18, 2019, fda announced its independent lab detected as best us in Johnson Johnsons talk based baby powder. In response to fdas announcement on october 18th, j and j issued limited recall of one lot of its talcum compound. On november 15, 2019, i sent an invitation to alex gorski requesting that he appear before the subcommittee to discuss the Public Health concerns regarding j and js baby powder. Im disappointed that j and
The argument annexed in case, thank you mister chief justice. Reasonable suspicion is the minimal standard,. Common sense judgment is the difference between ordinary suspicion experiences and hear the vehicle on the road the registered driver was incapable of operating the vehicle had to believe that under common sense to register shirt user was,. The common sense belief that, is the one that has been recognized by judges in 12 states, across the country, that is a findings, registered owner of the vehicle of the driver is a common sense influence, some may argue that the existence of her suspended. But the ugly 15 courts i just mention 11 of them have dealt with this process iteration, those have indicated that this reasonable suspicion continues to exist or, indeed, the factual critic of those, across the country, those are register, not register and continue to drive. Here deputy mayor, relied upon the common sense understanding, and at the pervasiveness of autumn a bill in the Unit
With lgbtq plus organizations who have trust with the community, to build the trust with our other partners and those are all of the steps were taking now to try to improve at the same time we try to improve our Data Collection. I think you know and would agree that in San Francisco in 2019, whatever the reason, this is troubling. We look forward to the full data and to the continued conversations with your office and with all of our partners and the board of supervisors. I think the way forward here is really, as ive said on a couple of small projects, is really about community and were really looking forward to our partnerships both with the board of supervisors, the mayors office, oti and much broader than that, were going to need the help of the full community to improve these numbers and we look forward to receiving that feedback, that reflection, that input, so that we can do better. The two other sort of subcategories of lgbtq that im curious about are the number the 16. 43 asse
Concerning biased. So the answer is, we dont know because we dont have the full data and we need to do better in the meantime because i dont want to be here a year from now saying now we have full data and its the same and we havent done anything in the meantime. So we have to work in parallel process to train, to reduce biased, to partner specifically with lgbtq plus organizations who have trust with the community, to build the trust with our other partners and those are all of the steps were taking now to try to improve at the same time we try to improve our Data Collection. I think you know and would agree that in San Francisco in 2019, whatever the reason, this is troubling. We look forward to the full data and to the continued conversations with your office and with all of our partners and the board of supervisors. I think the way forward here is really, as ive said on a couple of small projects, is really about community and were really looking forward to our partnerships both wi
Community, to build the trust with our other partners and those are all of the steps were taking now to try to improve at the same time we try to improve our Data Collection. I think you know and would agree that in San Francisco in 2019, whatever the reason, this is troubling. We look forward to the full data and to the continued conversations with your office and with all of our partners and the board of supervisors. I think the way forward here is really, as ive said on a couple of small projects, is really about community and were really looking forward to our partnerships both with the board of supervisors, the mayors office, oti and much broader than that, were going to need the help of the full community to improve these numbers and we look forward to receiving that feedback, that reflection, that input, so that we can do better. The two other sort of subcategories of lgbtq that im curious about are the number the 16. 43 assessed for coordinated entry, do we know what percentage