republicans. locks like debate on the floor of the house tomorrow. there is going to be a big vote tomorrow night. then they are going to name the impeachment managers in the house. and next stop it will be the u.s. senate. however, we have already heard from chuck schumer who is in the minority. a democrat leader there he does not like the fact that mitch mcconnell has k50rd nateed or spoken with the white house. he also now, mr. schumer does, he want a bunch of people who were not called by adam schiff and nancy pelosi. he wants them in the senate show. ainsley: listen. i haven t seen a single good argument about why these witnesses shouldn t testify. i told leader mcconnell i was ready to discuss trial rules. instead of talking to me, he spoke publicly about what a trial may look like. and said he was taking his cues from the white house. it was very partisan. very slanted. and very unfair.
celebrating mia s sweet 16. there they are. there is jackie and sharon posing in front of the tree. now look at this. mitch mcconnell is coming up on radio. bill: here we go. get ready for what s known as the house rules committee comes front and center today taking up articles of impeachment that we ll watch together. set the guidelines for the debate in a full house expected possibly tomorrow. full house vote we should say. good morning. here in new york city on a tuesday, good morning at home. how are you doing, smitty? sandra: good morning to you. a busy one. i m sandra smith. more moderate democrats represented districts trump won back in 2016 come forward to say that they will vote for impeachment. while lawmakers on both sides debate how to proceed. i told leader mcconnell i was ready to discuss trial rules. instead of talking to me, he
journal preventative medicine. people that smoke cigarettes are more likely to develop lung diseases than vaping. many people end up doing both. marion rafferty. now back to laura ingraham. sean: senator chuckie schumer is lashing out at majority leader mitch mcconnell tonight, and demanding that his handpicked witnesses be part of any senate trial. also, slamming the g.o.p. leader for saying that he will work with the white house throughout the process. imagine that. the white house actually will get to due process and some fairness for months. that is horrible. take a look. two weeks ago now, i told leader mcconnell, i was ready to discuss trial rules. instead of talking to me, he spoke publicly about what a trial may look like. said he was taking his cues from the white house. it was very partisan, very
i haven t seen a single good argument about why these witnesses shouldn t testify. i told leader mcconnell i was ready to discuss trial rules. instead of talking to me, he spoke publicly about what a trial may look like. and said he was taking his cues from the white house. it was very partisan. very slanted. very unfair. steve: sounds like the house. schumer was saying something completely different during bill clinton s impeachment. let s get in the way back machine chuck schumer 19999. any fair process would be consulting the white house because it s the president who is the defendant and due process would guarantee him fairness. it seems to me that no good case has been made for witnesses. what we ought to be doing instead of this is doing what the american people want us to do, which is make the schools better and
as the house marches toward this vote to impeach president trump, there s major wrangling over the trump trial. in the senate, chuck schumer says he went to mitch mcconnell two weeks ago proposing private negotiations over trial rules and mcconnell refused to engauge at the time. then friday, mcconnell went on sean hannity to publicly preview his approach. he will take his cues from trump s lawyers. so then schumer offered compromised positions. bipartisan rules, limit the witnesses, limited subpoenas. in negotiating materials, this is important. you can think of it as another merritt garland strategy. trying to soften the mcconnell brick wall by opening some sort of debate or negotiation with a