so we are going to pass this. so there s a little bit of pushback there, but once republicans have control of the house, it is just gonna be a lot of gridlock. there are some places where the white house feels like maybe they can get things done. immigration was one of them, that is one thing that is moving around the senate and during the lame duck session, but there is not a lot of expectation that really anything significant is going to get. on immigration, i cannot imagine anything will get done on that in the coming year, but you never know. we will see. caralee, the mitchell, simone townsend, what a way to start our week. three brilliant women. coming up, today s supreme court arguments in a case involving lgbtq rights. on many civil rights, many could say that it could provide license discriminate. later, the target attack on north carolina s energy grid that has thousands of people facing another cold night without heat. what we know as the fbi is now involved in the investig
until the next congress, and his own party and said no, we are not going to do that. this is not happened in decades, so we are going to pass this. so there s a little bit of pushback there, but once republicans have control of the house, it is just gonna be a lot of gridlock. there are some places where the white house feels like maybe they can get things done. immigration was one of them, that is one thing that is moving around the senate and during the lame duck session, but there is not a lot of expectation that really anything significant is going to get. on immigration, i cannot imagine anything will get done on that in the coming year, but you never know. we will see. caralee, the mitchell, simone townsend, what a way to start our week. three brilliant women. coming up, today s supreme court arguments in a case involving lgbtq rights. on many civil rights, many could say that it could provide license discriminate. later, the target attack on north carolina s energy grid
and what did his wife know? and when did each of them know it? that s a really relevant question. in watergate, it was about the president. this is about the president, but it s ex-president, but it also at this point is about a supreme court justice and it needs to be investigated, and it will. what do you think when you hear people say that if richard nixon then had today s republican party, today s supreme court, and fox news, that he would have survived the watergate scandal, that because he didn t have that infrastructure, he suffered, but that trump, for example, is lucky that he has it. no, i think the answer is, the republicans 50 years ago exemplified barry goldwater, stood their ground and said, wait a minute, this is unacceptable behavior. and as we know, goldwater, i