speak to are actually there is a lot of potential there for crossover if you put her in that progressive category that we put bernie into in 2016. there was a lot of crossover, for instance, when it came to trade policy, when it came to trying to revive the midwest and industrial policy. so i think she will she could outsmart him in that sense, however, i don t think we can declare that she s going to be completely immune from that type of an attack when she s up on a debate stage and that s why these next debates are going to be so interesting to see how, you know, she handles it now that she s coming up and she s a real threat to bernie sanders, which opens anyone up once they startle vagt to that level to then becoming the piñata. once you rise. we ve talked about her taking a punch. i really want to see if she can throw a punch. that s the thing. kamala harris proved she could come out and is willing to punch the biggest guy in the room. i have not seen that from elizabeth
at the airport picked up by canadian authorities at the behes t behest of the u.s. government. several senior advisers to the president say trade talks continue separate from this. this arrest was months in the making. this was an executive who wasn t going to be in the united states so they waited forren vancouver. there s an extradition agreement. it may take months before she even make it to the u.s. if she does at all. the arrest was about iran sanctions and the claim is that this company was violating those sanctions. but underlying it all is this larger sense of concern about china, about technology and about espionage. i am hard pressed to see how that can go forward. there s nothing wrong with it. the justice department can and is taking an aggressive stance. but where is the macro policy? how does this fit in to trade policy and where are the reassurances to businesses that there is a plan in place, that there s a coherent, maybe even global attempt to work with
the event itself. washington township, michigan, president trump fulminating, 30 minutes behind schedule, he was supposed to have left this venue, this indoor soccer stadium in washington township 30 minutes ago. he continues to speak on any number of issues. he s been talking for 75 minutes in length so far. we ve been monitoring that. he s talked about the russia investigati investigation, talked about james comey, talked about immigration, trade policy, foreign policy. the next congressional elections. just a moment ago talking about the 2016 elections. and exit polls. we are going to continue to monitor what the president has to say as we go back to washington, d.c. my colleague, savannah sellers, has been along the red carpet in the washington hilton talking to folks coming in, going into that ballroom, she caught up with kellyanne conway, councilor to the president. let s hear a bit of their exchange. i m here with kellyanne conway, how are you? i m great, thank you. hi, ho
tonight s white house correspondents association dinner. alex sites walled, let me return to you and ask you about the president s messaging in light what was we heard from kellyanne conway, about his tendency or desire to talk to folks directly, how much damage does he do by having i said elliptical, wide-ranging speeches, touching on everybody from the fbi to immigration to james comey s firing, to trade policy, to north korea, to that recent summit between north and south korea? i would hate to be the teleprompter operator for the president of the united states. it has to be a very difficult job, assuming he is even following the teleprompters set up on stage there. you know, it s hard to tell. because when he gives these speeches, they put out some purpose of this. this is supposed to be about the economy and trade. almost immediately that goes out the window. because he majors a thousand headlines on 200 or a thousand different topics, steps over endorsements he s supposed to
potential benefits of a new trade agreement that claims will increase u.s. exports by $11 billion while opening korean s markets to american goods. thanks so much. first of all. for doing something relatively impressive as it relates to trade policy. that s why i am work with this