He said, i regret that vote i have been saying that was the wrong decision. We were misled. There was false intelligence about wmds. She said i had dozens of debates with candidate obama in 2008, where he really hammered me on this vote. After that, he chose me as his secretary of state. After that, i was in the situation room when they were deciding whether they would go after osama bin laden. So she essentially said, i have learned from some of the mistakes i have made but my records show my judgment when it comes to Foreign Policy. The American Voter will decide whether they take that to be true. Guest tendon molly otoole from defense 11. Thank you for the time and information. Been mollyt has otoole from defense one. We will be back tomorrow as we are every day, 7 00 eastern time, for more washington journal. Have a great day. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] [captions Copyright
We do not want that from a fiscal responsibility, and we want that ease of the parent can have a child at the right place with the right care even if its across state line. I would say we look forward to working with you, welcome the opportunity if their questions in ways we can provide Technical Assistance and other things as part of this we welcome that opportunity because we agree with the fundamental of what were trying to do and believe this is something that can approve both cost and quality. I would encourage you and your department to take a look at the bill. Its not illegal or immoral for the administration to issue a letter of support. This is one that i think with chairman upton and chairman pitts, Ranking Member, full committee, subcommittee, leadership on both sides of the aisle in the south this bill could go. That could be part of chairman uptons 21st century effort or could be a standalone bill. I also in the brief time i have want to concur with what Ranking Member gre
Persons who surpass us in experience age and prudence as to their demonstrations. Aristotle argued that law has no power to command obedience except that of habit. And so laws should not be likely changed. The digest incorporates this view of positive law when describing the enactment of campers cautioning that new laws must have some clear it adage in view such as to justify departing from a rule of law which has seemed fair since time immemorial. So then stories natural law philosophy fits comfortably with his work in approach to positive law. The Crucial Point of similarity between these two theories is this. Both assume that mankind has a fixed nature. The modern idea of inalienable and socially constructed human nature is alien to burke and aquinas and therefore is alien to story and as we will now see stories in view of mans nature was cast aside by our own Supreme Court as it exited the 20th century and entered the 21st. How different our constitutional jurisprudence would be to
Natural law. Remarkably for the story as other natural law thinkers, positive law that conflicts with natural law is not law at all. Having examined stories general philosophical work let us see how he applied his law in cases. In the case of the an American Public armed vessel seized an allegedly french ship as suspected of engaging in the trafficking of slaves. The american captain asserted that the trafficking of slaves from africa to a Foreign Court violated the law of nations, and therefore, the con my accusation of the ship was the appropriate penalty. Stories opinion begins by claiming the law of nations rests on the eternal law of nature. The law of nature he said is deduced by correct reasoning from the right and duties of nations and the nature of moral obligation. Natural law for story is the basis for the law of nations. However, story is careful to note that he as a judge only has the authority to end force the law of nations if it has not been relaxed or waived by the con
Has that exclusion. He says except the tenant that it has been modified by the consent of nations. When it has been modified by the consent of nations, then you follow the law identified i that enactment. That by that enactment. That is the way i approach things. There are laws which i come across quite frequently which with i disagree. But they are binding on me as a federal judge. It is my job to enforce that law as it is written by the congress , assuming it is a federal law, and to carry it out. That is the brilliant solution that i inc. We have in terms of our own system i think we have in terms of our own system of checks and balances. Cantors can to make make the stakes make mistakes. Me to correcto the mistakes of the legislatures. I have to comply with the law. I am with the cato institute. Let me post pose a critical but not a hostile question. Ok. [laughter] i commend you for taking the subject seriously of the natural law, too few judges do. I want to go back to the distinc