new homes and new schools. the president-elect has also already disposed of all of his investments of publicly traded or easily liquidated investments. as a result, the trust will have two types of assets. first, it will hold liquid assets, cash, cash equivalents, and treasury, and perhaps some position in a government approved diversified portfolio, one consistent with regulations of the office of government ethics. second, the trust is going to hold his pre-existing very valuable business aspects, the ones that people are from therewith. trump owned, operated, and branded golf clubs, resorts, hotels, rights to royalties from pre-existing licenses of trump marked productions and goods. things like trump tower, mar-a-lago, all of his other business assets, 40 wall street, we ll all be in the trust. through instructions in the trust agreement, president-elect trump first orders that all
and it is a whole new era in fighting. kind of like this. barack obama has been president since january 2009. in all of the time he has been president, he has never fought like this before. he has never, before today, done there for a significant piece of legislation. but today he did it. veto. boom. i am returning herewith without pli approval senate bill 1. the keystone xl hype line approval act. the presidential power to veto legislation is one i take seriously but i also take seriously my responsibility to the american people. because this act of congress conflicts with established executive branch procedures and cut short thorough consideration of issues that could bear on our national interest including security safety and environment, this bill the
possible deal that might be struck. both sides saying no deal yet. unclear whether it s going to get done. were it to happen, then we ll see what? that s a good question. i m still optimistic. a give it a 60/40, but i know there are a couple of things that need to be done yet. and we may not get a framework. we may get an agreement and then work on the framework and the details associated therewith, but i m discouraged by the fact that the 47 republicans did what they did. i m discouraged by the fact that senator corker chairman of the foreign relations committee, still wants to put his legislation forth, because it s a deal breaker. and if the 47 republicans and tom cotton in particular haven t convinced mr. corker and people like tim kaine and angus king and other people who might be an opposite force, if that haven t convinced them that my party and intent on disrailing this agreement, i don t know what
see what? that s a good question. i m still optimistic. a give it a 60/40, but i know there are a couple of things that need to be done yet. and we may not get a framework. we may get an agreement and then work on the framework and the details associated therewith, but i m discouraged by the fact that the 47 republicans did what they did, that mr. corker, chairman of the foreign relations committee, still wants to put his legislation forth, because it s a deal breaker. and if the 47 republicans and tom cotton in particular haven t convinced mr. corker and people like kim cane and angus king, and other people who might be an opposite force, if that haven t convinced them that my party and intent on disrailing this agreement, i don t know what will. we need the democrats to stand behind the president if this agreement is to have any chance