programs to this one. we didn t agree with that because we weren t trying to cut other worthy programs. well, whatever the case, the n.f.l. thought it could buy its way out of any further controversy surrounding the anthem, but basically paying off patchwork of left-leaning groups. but it didn t completely work. on the broadcast side of the issue, increasingly liberal espn has decided it will no longer air the playing of the star-spangled banner at all before monday night football. i hope colin and company are happy with that. the fans aren t. viewership of the n.f.l. season opener, at least, was down 13% from last year and reached the lowest rating for an opening game since 2009, they did better yesterday, though. i have a better idea of all this, if the players or n.f.l. were truly concerned about making life better for minorities in the united states, why not consider dropping the
ratner, to barack obama, happening under trump. growth in manufacturing under trump is product of booming economy, product of developing markets overseas, wages raising, natural to happen. started under obama. laura: then why didn t he don t forget, the jobs obama was creating, 20,000 more per month than under the trump administration last two years of the obama administration, not like this just happened. laura: there were jobs created, this goes back to the resistance, do you agree with what victor davis hanson was say something yeah, victor is right, politics about two commodities, connections and money and donald trump is a threat to both of those things, doesn t give a rat s caboose and doesn t need your money tochlt christian s point, too, i love debate withing chris, rarely knows numbers and doesn t know the numbers now either.
assistants to the president, 40 or 50 people. laura: nikki haley came out with new york times op ed that said, when i want to challenge the president, i do so directly to his face and there was word that the president didn t like that that much, why do you have to write a column with that focus. again, it was fairly positive toward the president, but pointing out she disagreed with him on key issues. when i worked for the reagan administration it wasn t out there constantly you had perpetual in-fighting, people less conservative than reagan. more sense of movement. steve bannon: i don t know, when jim baker, toward the end of first term or second term, you had put in conservatives everyday. white houses are naturally laura: that is okay. steve bannon: opinions laura: that is okay, trump likes people with differing opinions and in the end, did