yes, brian manly, theig police chief of austin, who you just showed explaining the 25-minute extraordinary confession by the suspected austin serial bomber will be joining us live at 45 minutes after the hour. behind me, mark anthony conditt s house in the community of pflugerville. it s north of the capital city of austin that was terrorized for the last three weeks by the 23-year-old punk. as the chief suggests, that confession is not an admission of race, hatred or terrorism. it was rather a narcissistic woe is me, my life is. terrible. that is why please understand that is what compelled me to murder two innocent people, and grievously injure five others and absolutely terrorize the texas capital for the entire month of march. he has a three-room home here. one room they have been
application. or mr. mccabe. or rosenstein. or loretta lynch. because mr. mueller is not investigating interference in the russia in the campaign. because if he was, he would do not only what i said, but heig would be investigating comey and mccabe for interfering in our election. here s the big story. the obama administration didn t want to interfere with our election than the loathsome, loathsome vladimir putin. whether it s unmasking, whether it s susan rice refusing to allow the cyberspace folks to investigate, the obama administration did more to interfere with our election than the russians! that s the story. sean: great one, you are one of the hardest interviews i ve ever had. that is a superb analysis, good job as always. life, liberty and levin every sunday night and p.m., number one show on cable. you don t want to miss it. when we come back, peter
regulations that have gone. he has put forward his plans. there has been in my way a lack of urgency in the congress. not moving fast enough for my satisfaction. we see that they ran into a roadblock in the house, able to overcome it.ti but now the roadblock in repealing and replacing obamacare. after seven years, every conservative i know is throwing up their hands saying, what is the problem? it is time for the party to lead on health care. they did a good job in the house, but now time for the senate to get this thing done. either this week, or soon after. but you look at what the president has done, and that the regulation you look at theon realignment in foreign policy. the optimism on jobs, and you look at theig unemployment rate. you look at trade, the amount of work and accomplishments that the president has put forward, check the boxes. it is staggering. and the press secretary said it
point that it was a drunk driver or traditional traffic accident, and going towards the sort of the attacks scenario, then there is really the lone wolf or the direct attack. if it is a direct attack, because we are under the heightened security, and one would imagine that it involves a heig heightened intelligence collection and very heavy police presence with the direct attack which is important to note that it is coming with the infrasucture and coming with renting a van, and money change, and all of those things are detectable. and so when you have a information service like that in the uk, you would think that a direct attack especially in the heightened threat scenario, this is something they would be looking for in the direct attack, and because there was not a threat there, it does lend credibility, and i want to be careful in saying this, but it is lending credibility that it is not a directed attack, and in fact, perhaps it could have been something that we would have assign
that he would not get it out, by the way i was very critical of what james 12 did against hillary clinton, going on and off again. sean: let me get greg in the segment. you have been focused and m on e law that says if james comey thought it was obstruction, he had a legal obligation to save immediately. j this was government material he leaked to the new york times. where is his investigation into him, and if heig did it to get a special counsel that ends up being his best friend? and where has james comey ben? under the law, there can be no obstruction of justice because there is no lie, threat, or bribe. but, which is required under the chlaw, but, what about loretta lynch? if she tried to squash this