clear why. it was brought in principally clear why. it was brought in principally to clear why. it was brought in principally to reduce - clear why. it was brought in principally to reduce the - principally to reduce the overreliance on very wealthy benefactor because that s simply not financially sustainable.- simply not financially sustainable. ., ., , sustainable. uefa said it wants to protect sustainable. uefa said it wants to protect clubs sustainable. uefa said it wants to protect clubs from - sustainable. uefa said it wants to protect clubs from financial| to protect clubs from financial trouble and to keep football fair. and in 2014, it fined nine clubs for breaking the rules. manchester city was one of them. it paid a 60 million euro fine while insisting it hadn t broken the rules. that was 2014. four years later, the german newspaper beagle published this investigation based on leaked e mails from inside manchester city. it claimed: the story connected to a central
rules of financial fair play. manchester city denies doing this but uefa investigated. in 2020 it concluded: it banned city from european club competitions for two years but the club s position remained unequivocal. the most im ortant remained unequivocal. the most important thing remained unequivocal. the most important thing i remained unequivocal. the most important thing i have remained unequivocal. the most important thing i have to - important thing i have to say todayis important thing i have to say today is that the allegations are not true. today is that the allegations are not true. and city took the matter to are not true. and city took the matter to the are not true. and city took the matter to the court are not true. and city took the matter to the court of - matter to the court of arbitration for sport and contested all of the charges, including sponsorship allegation. including sponsorship alleuation. ~ .., , allegation. when the case went before cas. all