match the public record. efntle we have the president sending this airtight letter to capitol hill this week saying how atrocious this whole scam has been in the house. they don t let you do anything. it is totally shut down the republicans so that say we re not going to cooperate if you rig this against us do you think it that s a smart move strategically? look that was a beautifully written letter from a legal stand point it was a brief sight the supreme court which is repeatedly said due process applying not just to congressional investigations, but any impeachment inquiry. and the fact of this is by unilateral decision from nancy pelosi to launch this inquiry, they are obliterating procedural protections of due process secret witnesses, testifying behind closed doors, the other side isn t even allowed to look at the evidence.
terms of planning for tomorrow, they re going to have to decide on a lot of things, even if it is just a couple of minutes between the two leaders interacting. will president trump walk across the demarcation line like president moon did last april? will he be the first president to center one of those blue huts where they lock the door to the room to make sure the other side isn t in there at the same time? could president trump walk in there and have a chat with kim jong un at the table where negotiation himself taken place over the decades of the establishment of the demilitarized zone. it going to be really extraordinary to see what happens. nobody is expecting a breakthrough in terms of negotiations, but what s going to happen is kim and trump are going to capitalize that they have. they do apparently have a good relationship and they could show
table in advance. harris: catherine herridge, great to have you always pray thank you very much. i want to bring in our alan dershowitz, harvard law professor emeritus. good to see today. i think you are probably able to hear catherine m. what i was saying is that d conflict word, when will you tell us the truth, are you telling us the truth, are you one? that sort of stuff. the one thing i caught that kind of stood out from adam schiff, chairman of the house intel, was not in the investigation. he added the words without talking with the president under oath. but i clearly got the part about not in the investigation. well, first of all, i think people are making a mountain out of a mole hill out of this meeting that occurred. congressional staffers and members of congress meets with favorable witnesses all the time. for example, when they are being vented. they will talk about answers, they go over questions. the other side isn t there. this is just very common. the only probl
in the senate. at the same time that s happening, michael cohen will be testifying in congress for three days. right. wednesday is the public hearing. what will you be listening for? you know, i ll be listening for a lot of things lauren laid out there. what he says about the president s final dealings, what he says about the president s taxes. elijah cummings, the chairman of that committee, laid it out what the scope of this will be in a memo last week. so we might cohen s not going to be allowed to talk about a lot of the russia investigation, we assume, during this hearing and cummings said that won t be their focus. but the trump foundation, the president s businesses, all of these red lines that the president said that congress cannot cross are going to be crossed all over the place. the other interesting thing to watch is usually when these witnesses come to congress, one side is kind of soft on them and the other side isn t. that s not going to happen this time. congr
the missiles could destroy cities within ten minutes of being launched had been deployed throughout europe and the soviet union. the inf was a crowning success and it cooled tensions at a critical moment, the cold war. nearly 2700 nuclear missiles were destroyed between the u.s. and soef union. why would we ditch it now? the russians have not been honoring the treaty. putin criticized it as early as 2007 and was producing new weapons systems during the obama years drawing a stern diplomatic rebuke but little else. a treaty isn t worth much when the other side isn t respecting it. it made sense in a dual superpower world but much less sense today when it s estimated 95% of china s 2,000 nuclear missiles fall into this category. now unless we all change course within six months, the treaty will be officially over and open escalation may escalate on both sides. nuclear arms races are good for