uncomfortable and apologised for that but he didn t believe his immediate sacking was warranted. however, speaking on the today programme, brian mcbride said his account was not the full story. i think tony s description there was selective. tony and i had a conversation when he was dismissed. i followed it up with a legal letter explaining everything in detail and so there is more in that letter than what we have just talked about. you haven t showed him the report, have you? the law firm s report? that s correct. why haven t you showed him that? so that report was commissioned by the board using the law firm fox williams. and those who spoke to it were offered confidentiality, they were offered that the comments would not be relayed. and that was the basis on which we ran the report and the basis on which tony danker knew the report was being run. so where does that leave the cbi. government and memberfirms are unwilling to engage with it until the rest of the investigation into
they believed there was a conflict. they raised it. i think they had to with the judge as a potential conflict. and then i stood up and made it very clear to the judge there is, bret, the one thing i m sure about in this case there is no conflict of interest. it s very clear on the law. new york rules of interest 1-18 due to clients. i never met stormy daniels. i never spoke to stormy daniels. she never hired me. she did call the law firm and spoke to an associate and sent over a document in regards to the possible hiring of us as lawyers. my associates spoke to her once or twice whenever. when it was brought to my attention when they were finished discussing it, i said i m not interested in that case in any way, way, shape, or form and that was the end of it. she never hired me or spoke to me or whatever. of course there is no conflict. even if there were a conflict and there isn t, it s been wade by storm daniels.
issued an apology for the event that stops short of reprimanding the dean despite participation in the heckling when a judge pleaded for someone to calm the crowd. the stanford student said, someone so eager to shut down free speech has no place as a stanford dean. meanwhile the judge warning, if in ten or 20 years time, this behavior is the norm in the classroom, the law firm, the ideology trump reasonable debate, then rule of law will have turned into barbarism. todd: that is an important point he has made but comforting to have done the story over the course with the stanford students to stand up and say, this is not right. ashley: the republicans are done being stonewalled and taking a major new step to get their hands on hunter biden s business records. we have the brand-new details. todd: chinese president xi shipping with ukrainian
behavior matters. what if in 10 or 20 years time this kind of norm is the courtroom, the law firm, the bedroom. it was terrible. ainsley: dean that did heckle him associate dean for diversity, equity and inclusion according to the daily mail. steve: did not get in trouble. ainsley: that statement you just read is pretty powerful clean-up true. indoctrinate the kids young age. most of them are left because they haven t paid taxes. i get more conservative as you get older. young minds influenced by all of the stuff that s going on right now. and then they are going to go out and spread these messages and then take them into our courts. steve: they only want to hear their side. ainsley: that s exactly right. brian: opposite of a law school. walked into a doesn ting class people go i m outraged by what this person is saying. it s a law class and you invited them. you invited them it there to speak. if you are going to argue with someone the first thing you have got to do is l
alex, fingerprints and footprints. they broszed it within five days? because they didn t, the gps data got overwritten, which would have been helpful to alex and fingerprints and footprints and all kinds of forensic things were not done. what do you make of the judge s comment after the verdict? he s entitled to his opinion. did you expect to appeal any time soon? ten days before we file an appeal. what did you say? what do you believe the strongest round of deals are? the financial crime evidence. that was offered up, you know, as evidence of motive that because he was confronted about one financial transaction involving attorney s fees by the chief of accounting of the law