Latest Breaking News On - The constitution doesn t - Page 7 : comparemela.com
have much leverage over him by the constitution doesn t give her any. the only way to make this work i suppose is to mount some sort of public pressure to demand witnesses. if mcconnell has the votes, he can run this trial anyway he wants to. bret: brit, do you get a sense not only on the ukraine but with this new talk about possibly looking back at the mueller report and theen documents the house is trying to get from the mueller investigation, the democrats are trying to find something even with more time to maybe even stick that into an impeachment article. that s what it sounds like. all of it as up to the same thing, doesn t it? adds up to the idea that whatever i have isn t enough and they have so far utterly failed to move a single republican vote either in the house or the senate, at least we know of. no senator has come forward to
Trial
Mitch-mcconnell
Witnesses
Way
Sort
Leverage
Work
Public-pressure
The-constitution-doesn-t
Votes
Bret-baier
House
presumption of good actors, and the whole system presumes deliberation, moderation, compromise and faith. that was madison s faith. and the assumption is that both parties would be striving toward the common good. when you have a system so polarized that either party trusts the good faith of other and there is no ability to agree about facts, that faith of the founders, come let us reason and deliberate together, breaks down. so we are in a remarkable moment. words like unprecedented and never seen before are just as good as your wonderful word, david, plas tisty. but the system can t survive unless it bends and adapts. when it doesn t, it will break and we re about to see a system that is polarizing at the very moment when people are supposed to coming together. polarization begets political creativity. that s what we re seeing here as well. what we are seeing nancy pelosi
Faith
Actors
System
Parties
Presumption
System-presumes
Moderation
Assumption
Deliberation
The-common-good
Madison
Us
the plas tisty of this process, about what we understand about impeachment, about how we re all still reckoning with and trying to understand what s happening here. that s a good word. it is remarkable how sparse the constitution is when it talks about impeachment. the chief justice has to preside, but that s it. and the debate between noah and lawrence isn t settled by the constitution. it s not settled by precedent because it s never happened before. if someone were to sue the house to require them to turn over the articles, there would be no precedent about that. the question of what the chief justice will do substantively if there is no agreement about the rules and democrats are saying you must admit certain witnesses and the republicans are saying you can t, the constitution doesn t speak to that either. it is remarkable how speaker pelosi did talk about the
Impeachment
Constitution
Process
Word
Plas-tisty
Debate
Chief-justice
Isn-t
Noah
Lawrence
Someone
Question
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.