i see your eyes lighting up. those emails, he met with christopher steele. after christopher steele was fired by the fbi for improper behavior. eric: was he a cutout to get information from christopher steele to the justice department? was he involved. they had an email steele saying they are worried they are going to be exposed. what does that mean? and does the president hold any water when it comes to his criticism? i think there is lots of water there. they had text message exchanges where they were talking about bob mueller as if he was part of the anti-trump resistance. there is lots of unanswered questions here. we couldn t definitely know what bruce ohr s role was. it was basically going outside
angry texts? that was just a way that paul and jennifer always were, said geragos. his proof? after those angry text message exchanges, here s what happened, as zumot described in his police interview. we talked, we smoked hookah. everything is fine. we did what we did, you know. and we slept together and we took two xanaxes. she took two more before me and we went to bed. so you slept in the same bed? oh, yeah. so you made up? yeah. made up and then we video ourselves. i mean, honestly, i probably shouldn t be saying that but that s her phone, her video. so you had sex with her last night and videoed it? yeah. sure enough. when police looked at jennifer s cell phone, there was a video. she and paul having sex after their fight hours before she was murdered. so enthusiastically that
week. it is tuesday. a lot going on with the fbi and lisa page how all know the lover of peter strzok and their text message exchanges. she was on the hill yesterday about those text messages and she was questioned by congress for the second day. she actually completely discredits peter strzok, her exlover in that testimony. she stands by her texts. she says i meant every word of those texts and what they mean. steve: in particular, you know, the infamous one that came out the day that the inspector general was going to have his report, curious timing there. remember this one where lisa page texted peter strzok and said trump s not ever going to become president, right, right? and strzok said no, no, we won t. he won t. we ll stop it. what he said during his testimony last week was we will stop it, meant the american people. well, apparently it sounds likes she might have had a dinner interpretation. and john ratcliffe, the congressman, he said that she was much more
starting with the political death penalty, an impeachment is not the logical way a neutral you know, point of order. we re demanding equal time. mr. chairman, if you can t control yourself, how do you expect this committee to control itself? you ve been out of control since you ve been on this committee. why don t you leave it alone? this is not benghazi. wow. i mean is that how you see today s hearings, another fishing expedition? oh, absolutely. i mean let me just tell you one good thing i think came out of this hearing. there is still no indication that whatever mr. strzok had on his text message exchanges, nothing has impacted the findings of the investigation. that s what the final report showed. go on. that s what the final report shows. we went into that knowing that. we ve come out of that knowing
dispassionate point of order. we re demanding equal time. he s not testifying here, mr. chairman, and if you can t control yourself how do you expect this committee to control itself? you ve been out of control since you ve been on this committee. why don t you leave it alone? this is not benghazi. is that how you see today s hearings? another phishing expedition? absolutely. let me just tell you one good thing i think came out of this hearing. there is still no indication that whatever mr. strzok had on his text message exchanges, nothing has impacted the findings of the investigation. that was what the final report shows. that s what the final report shows. we went into that knowing that, we ve come out of that knowing that if we don t know anything else. we could have been using our time as an oversight committee