conversations. they re not. i think the informant or the public is not really well informed to know what it really means. that s why so many people are against it. kimberly i want to get your reaction to what john brennan said this morning on face the nation, listen. do you think terrorist elements will take advantage of this? i think terrorist elements have watched carefully what s happened here in the united states. whether or not it s disclosures of classified information or changes in policy, they re looking for areas to operate within. and as washington tries to hash this out and it goes down to the wire do you think people that want to do harm to this country are watching that? well they re always watching for those seams to exploit. they re always watching for opportunities to communicate without anyone listening to them. is there going to be a flurry of phone calls and knowcontacts if this expires in the next six hours,
it would be reckless. we shouldn t allow it to happen. and that s just one of warning after warning that the white house has been giving lean leading up to this session, they call it dangerous interruptions in their ability to track terrorists the latest warning coming from cia director john brennan. do you think terrorist elements will take advance of this? think they have been paying attention to what happens in the united states. they are looking for the seams to operate within and this is something we can t afford to do right now because if you look at the horrific terrorist attacks and violence that s being perpetrated around the globe, we need to keep our country safe and our oceans are not keeping us safe the way they did a century ago. and the white house continues to say that there really is no plan b from their perspective, randi, really putting the onus on the senate. absolutely. sunlen serfaty. thank you very much.
don t believe in in a jewish state but it also, i think starts to erode. yeah. you know the meaning of democracy. can you remember having a meeting with the president and i walked out and said, mr. president congratulations on going and making that decision to get bin laden. i thought it was courageous. but here is the problem lately. what is the policy? what is foreign policy now? because i want success. i want the president to say we kicked butt in yemen where we put putin back in his place. we re leading again because we re not leading. there s a void being filled by the terrorist elements and criminal elements and that s what happens when america stands down. we need to be the country of good. we are the country of good. we live in the greatest country in the world. and we re all yearning for the president to be a leader and tell us what he s doing why he s doing it and what is next.
the difference between the pakistan taliban and the afghan taliban? what is that? when my fox news colleague ed henry questioned josh earnest about this horrific school attack in pakistan, the white house spokesman was quick to know it was the pakistani taliban that carried out this attack. the reason he made that distinction is ed in forming his question had asserted some linkage between this horrific event and the u.s. drawdown in afghanistan. and earnest was trying to delink this horrific event from the state of affairs that we re going to be leaving behind in afghanistan. bottom line here, both afghanistan and pakistan remain client states of the united states. both remain deeply troubled places with weak central governments not capable of neutralizing the terrorist elements in their midst. there is more to it because mr. earnest is not being honest with the american people. all right, the taliban in afghanistan live in pakistan primarily. that s where their sanctuaries are. th
the difference between the pakistan taliban and the afghan taliban? what is that? when my fox news colleague ed henry questioned josh earnest about this horrific school attack in pakistan, the white house spokesman was quick to know it was the pakistani taliban that carried out this attack. the reason he made that distinction is ed in forming his question had asserted some linkage between this horrific event and the u.s. drawdown in afghanistan. and earnest was trying to delink this horrific event from the state of affairs that we re going to be leaving behind in afghanistan. bottom line here, both afghanistan and pakistan remain client states of the united states. both remain deeply troubled places with weak central governments not capable of neutralizing the terrorist elements in their midst. there is more to it because mr. earnest is not being honest with the american people. all right, the taliban in afghanistan live in pakistan primarily. that s where their sanctuaries are. th