constitution. and the problem for meadows is the nature of the allegations here. because in order for a case to be removed under federal law, it has to fall within the outer perimeter of meadows official duties, and the things he s accused of doing are not owe fi figuresal duties. the president of the united states, certainly his chief of staff under the constitution, have no role in counting the vo votes in georgia or pressuring, as they re a skewsed of doing in the da s indictment, pressuring georgia s secretary of state brad raffensperger to find just 11,780 votes. so that makes it tough on the removal standard. then under the supremacy clause, the test is did he have a dut why i to do it?