Political restructuring doctrine test and to either mr. Bursch, isnt yes. Isnt the position that was taken in seattle derived from a different view of the equal protection clause . I mean, strict scrutiny was originally put forward as a protection for minorities a protection for minorities against hostile disadvantageous legislation. And so the view then was we use strict scrutiny when the majority is disadvantaging the minority. So you do, under the carolene products view, you do focus on race and you ask, is the minority being disadvantaged . If that were the view, then i suppose we would not be looking at this, well, the criterion is race and wherever the disadvantage falls, whether a majority or minority, its just the same. That wasnt the original idea of when strict scrutiny is appropriate. So if we were faithful to that notion, that it is measures a disadvantage the the minority that get strict scrutiny. Well, two thoughts on that, justice ginsburg. First, under grutter, this cou
Teams playing in the AVP Huntington Beach Open this weekend are competing to earn a spot in the brand-new AVP League, modeled similar to the structure of professional bull-riding.