facts. i think we ve discovered that by now. look, what is at the bottom of this? he understood, he came to understand that he was going to be greeted very, very negatively in london. he is deeply, deeply unpopular in britain. he was going to be greeted with demonstrations and protests and 2 was going to be a disaster for him. and you know, jim, i did an ax files television show with condoleezza rice that s going to air tomorrow night. she wrote in her book and she repeated on this show that she always thought that if you lose the brits you re alone if you re the american leader. he has lost the brits. he is alone. this cannot be good for the united states of america. that s a great point because there s a lot of talk of, well, this stuff all fades away, it s a 24-hour controversy and then it will be in our rearview mirror before you know it. here you have i mean, the
he is alone. this cannot be good for the united states of america. that s a great point because there s a lot of talk of, well, this stuff all fades away, it s a 24-hour controversy and then it will be in our rearview mirror before you know it. here you have i mean, the president has had repeated offensive statements about the uk going back. here you have a u.s. ally, the president cannot step foot in the uk. you ve served multiple presidents. can you imagine circumstances like that? never. never, ever. every president, the brits have been so grateful since world war ii and actually going all the way back to world war i for the partnership they have. and they ve always welcomed american presidents. people work across the aisle. tony blair could work across the aisle, you know, work with the right and with the left in america. that was important. but this also goes to something else, jim, that s very fundamental. and that is going back to the founding fathers, when they
when there is a terrorist incident in europe, doesn t wait for the facts and immediately politicizes them. we know he s trying to impose a ban on predominantly muslim countries to prevent people traveling here who he thinks would commit terrorist acts, trying to build a wall on the mexican border. i m sure we would have had a nonpartisan commission to investigate how this act happened, who let these people through. we know what happens when there s an incident like this from our own history. and, of course, in this case, basically nothing is happening. there s some talk of, you know, limiting the application mechanism this guy used to more rapidly fire bullets but when the perpetrator is a foreign country, we immediately say, what was the country of origin and how do we attack this and how do we prevent it from happening again. when the country of origin is us we hear no evil, speak to evil and say no evil. and david frum, of course, the numbers are staggering,
stainless steel surfaces are spiffed up each year in a week long operation. the cleaners have to scale one hundred meters to reach its nine spheres which represent an iron crystal enlarged one hundred sixty five billion times the it told me it was built in one nine hundred fifty eight for the world s fair it s gearing up to celebre. it s sixtieth birthday next year. i m exhibition at the. expose weather phenomenon from an artistic standpoint. on view of works like john constable saulsbury cathedral from the meadows and for talk of. these work. scientific instruments also in display like the hemispheres produced by. the exhibition questions how climate change its affects civilization it runs through march twenty eighth.
these documents in a safe in the context of a broader conversation about document production and different approaches to document production where cobb wanted there to be more disclosure of documents and mcgahn wanted there to be less disclosure or a more careful review of those documents before they were disclosed certainly suggests that ty cobb believed that these documents in the safe were somehow critical and should be turned over to muler and that mcgahn did not. we don t know what these documents are. all we know is there is a potential debate about that. as you explain in the piece, ty cobb is more of the school of thought let s just turn it all over and get this thing over with more quickly which is in contrast to what don mcgahn says. there s also a line in the piece, ken, where you hear talk of, of course, fears or tensions within the white house and so some people are worried that some people may be miked for bob mueller. why?