quickly, i don t believe that. i think whoever wrote that is wrong. but there will be a point at which when you are 20% through you can t go back. chris: as a member of the senate armed services committee, can you explain what that means when you are 20% through you can t go back? i don t think that we should relax sanctions in any way until we are far down the path if not at the end of the road of north korea s denuclearization. i think the president was using that number as an example. he will have to open his country to weapons inspectors. he will need to make a complete declaration of his nuclear program and they will need to develop steps to remove those nuclear materials and certified and denuclearize. the president is right that once you get far enough down that road it would be very hard to reverse those steps. we should not relax sanctions up front. that s one reason why i was opposed to deal with iran, because we were relaxing sanctions, giving concessions on
ground. well already have reports of china loosening implementation of sanctions on the ground level. now he is going t go back. the whole world is now thinking he is a normal person. we talked about human rights violationshe looks like a normal person. it s going to be hard to get back to theaximum pressure policy he had before. just to be disappear from our view, an armored mercedes with flags on the front and no license plate on the rear. that s the vehicle carrying kim jong-un into the talks. victor, the imagery, the use of news media is so interesting. there is a chase car behind the motorcycles, but in front of the mercedes with media out the sun roof aiming back at the limousine that would be free media were it our president in this country. it s north korean state-run media because some of these pictures will be turned into postage stamps. some of these pictures will be turned into posters and handouts
he did acknowledge it takes a long time scientifically, but he s already started the process and once you start you can t go back. what we ve seen are a few explosions at the entrances of tunnels. what we saw way back in the 1990s was the stopping of a k w nuclear reactor. and finally on the idea of, you know, complete verifiable, he said on being asked that question he said yeah, we will have a lot of people there and he suggested that it would be americans and foreigners, a mix of inspectors on the ground. but none of that is clear in this what he called comprehensive document. i mean, all i ve seen at the moment is two pages with four points, one of which simply reasserts what north korea agreed with south korea in april. so i think neither of the
i suspect in some way you might not even agree with that that organizing and the media attention and all that was a way to get through these 39 days. now the cameras are going to go away, how are you doing and secondly, do you look at going back to be in high school students is something you ll be able to do? throughout the negativity we have seen there s a lot of support positivity and that s what keeps us going. knowing that so many people stand with us. just because cameras aren t there doesn t mean we won t go back. we ll never go back to school and feel the same that we once did. take it in stride. we have to continue working on it. it s been a frenzy the past couple of weeks. the fact that we have had each other, that s how we ve gone through. we been supporting each other and smiling to the paint together. the fact that we still have our each other and that will still have the stunning community.
places and that s why they can t go back. you can t really say both, can you? no, i think the position in the lawsuit, and certainly if you look at the designation that supports this is that the justifications for granting temporary protected status to people from el salvador and haiti and sudan and nicaragua remain in place today. the countries continue to be tucker: no, no, no. but about so trump s comments, the ones that were reported, and we don t really know exactly what he said. but i m willing to believe he said that, because it s true, by the way. a lot of these countries are hellholes. are you taking issue with that? are you saying that it s wrong to call haiti a hellhole, but no one here from haiti can be returned to haiti because it s a hellhole? i mean, will you just engage with that core thing? no. right, yeah, no, tucker.r. what the president has reported to have said is that we don t want people from these s-hole countries, and so it was an expression of animus