I would say that, i would agree with ian. Public to push back a little on the slippery slope trajectory of skirting the essentialist line. But also to say that i think the Politics Around it can be articulated in particular ways that would also make for me would have appreciable differences with the motivations and the reasons and the justifications for taking a decision not to invest a i with this kind of responsibility and authority. We could also add one other thing, before we opened things up. Is maybe if i come in trying to think of ways to civil by the approach to the kind of claim we are making in a way that might be useful, there is always risks with the simplification. People will look at a policy debate going right now in universities is the idea of using these robot grading systems, these Automated Systems are grading College Students essays which are of course important, particularly for universities that like the Business Model of the mooc because how to take revenge of th
We pushed for that. We wanted that. We will we think the labeling is very important. We are also confirmed book what we are all stashed what we are also concerned about is we do not have a Public Education campaign. There are banner ads and social media telling youth not to use this product and that it is damaging to developing brains. Colorado and, i might add, Washington State has not quite opened their stores yet and they already have that campaign going. We have 340 stores your. We just havent gotten a rolling it. Guest we will take a call from sam in iowa. Caller i am glad they are protecting juveniles from this. My problem is the 18 to 21yearolds. They can hold a gun and fight for our country at 18 years old. But they are not allowed to smoke a plant because they are still considered children. We have had the edible marijuana in california for years. We dont have any of those crazy things youre talking about where people kill themselves over it. Host . I will let our guest respon
Believes hes a human being marrying another human being. Finally, you have the idea which is that in oshd torder to fit jurist, you have to understand, sympathize and use the norms of your community because thats part of the complicated relationship there dworkins thought, a fit between what you want to say and the justification of those norms. Here again, i had some thoughts. I dont think the point that is made in this paper, i think its a bit too strong. First of all, once again, many people come to Yale Law School from many countries around the world. They are not americans. They have been exposed to American Culture through tuition, perhaps. And theyre ab mere fact that y not share a communitys norms does not qualify you making good, legal arguments. Secondly, its a very strange argument to come from two canadians. After all, canada is part of the British Commonwealth. One thing we know about the British Commonwealth is that British Commonwealth exported colonial law. It was the la