We asked how you usually pay your muni fare. We broke it more than we had in past years. In the past we just had clipper as one groupings. In 2017 we broke it out between the pass and monthly pass. Adding those two you have 56 . One thing to call on the slide is cash at 27 . When you compare that sto 2016 its down slightly. It was at 29 last year. 27 . Not a big difference there in terms of the different types of fare payment as well as the rest of the options there. We also asked among riders who used cash as their primary method why. Far and away its do you prefer to pay cash as i ride. Over 50 said that. Theres actionable things on the list and things more difficult. The first one is tough. I just prefer to pay cash. You look at the others, Cash Transfer say better value. Dont have access to a card. Theres other reasons where you may take action on that. The first ones a tough one. And we did a tracking study thats been going on many years now. This particular question i think was a
Of muni everyday riders and people who dont use it as frequently. But everybody used it at least once in the past six months. Here again youll have multiple purpose people use muni for. The slide represent the primary use of muni. We tried for one response. No surprise, commute to work or workrelated business represents over half of the type of trips people take as primary usage. But people use it for a variety of reasons. We spoke to multiple respondents. We asked how you usually pay your muni fare. We broke it more than we had in past years. In the past we just had clipper as one groupings. In 2017 we broke it out between the pass and monthly pass. Adding those two you have 56 . One thing to call on the slide is cash at 27 . When you compare that sto 2016 its down slightly. It was at 29 last year. 27 . Not a big difference there in terms of the different types of fare payment as well as the rest of the options there. We also asked among riders who used cash as their primary method wh
Respondents. We asked how you usually pay your muni fare. We broke it more than we had in past years. In the past we just had clipper as one groupings. In 2017 we broke it out between the pass and monthly pass. Adding those two you have 56 . One thing to call on the slide is cash at 27 . When you compare that sto 2016 its down slightly. It was at 29 last year. 27 . Not a big difference there in terms of the different types of fare payment as well as the rest of the options there. We also asked among riders who used cash as their primary method why. Far and away its do you prefer to pay cash as i ride. Over 50 said that. Theres actionable things on the list and things more difficult. The first one is tough. I just prefer to pay cash. You look at the others, Cash Transfer say better value. Dont have access to a card. Theres other reasons where you may take action on that. The first ones a tough one. And we did a tracking study thats been going on many years now. This particular question
The ride hailing is up is an increase from 2015. When asked whats the main reason you would use uber or lyft rather than muni. One is really the top three have to do with speed and direct service. Those are the key reasons far and away. Its fast and goes direct to my destination. I dont want to wait. Doortodoor services and theres others but in terms of the top ones they have to do with that theme. The last slide was an asked of a different group. This represents those who havent used it in the past six months and asked whats the main reason you dont ride muni more. This slide represent whats people told us. We took down their responses and coded them into different categories. The commute travel out of the city is a tough one and other ones such as muni trips take too long, rules, dont want to be held to a schedule that are actionable in terms of riders who dont currently use muni. That concludes the presentation. Thank you very much. Director thank you. Very much. That was a good dir
Over the rights of westerners who should have more local input the monuments were too big so they needed to be smaller. What was the decision for expanding the money men at the time. President clinton expanded one and president obama created the other. Both were created under the antiquity sack which is a centuriesold law that allows president s to unilaterally protect areas of cultural or scientific significance. Both president clinton and obama said these are areas that have cultural meaning for native american tribes who lived there. They have special scientific and archaeological qualities. So they created them as National Monuments. With the previous president s applied the antiquity sect, should they apply versus others . This is been used by both parties throughout history. President obama used at the most. He created the most National Monuments. President Teddy Roosevelt signed it into law. He was the first to use it. Will continue their conversation about this act yesterday. I