it is about kavanaugh s credibility. in light of mitchell s sober analysis that she released shouldn t the media be concerned about the credibility of ford sh account. substantiating witnesses and corroboratings, witnesses and wn all three are called in question by mitchell isn t it time for the media to entertain the fact that they may have gone too far in their coverage and that is the angel. joining me now former secret service agent why aren t democrats taking the report for mitchell more seriously. this whole notion thatat we e
these allegations are. they have to deal with improper conduct at various points of his career. my sources tell my colleague that the committee is in talks to delay the confirmation hearing while they try to wrap their heads around these new details. he is not someone who had a lot of management experience. how far along are they? are they refuting or substantiating allegations? we spoke to a number of democratic lawmakers huddling on this issue. one of them telling us these are raw allegations. they are trying to figure out if there is any factual basis. we heard from top democrat on the veterans committee telling his staff giving them enough
their heads around the new details. jackson s not someone who had a lot of management experience, and people had concerns about what his policy views are to lead one of the government s largest federal agencies. how far along are they, are they refuting or substantiating allegations? reporter: they are trying to figure this out. we spoke to democratic lawmakers who are huddling on the hill tonight. these are raw allegations, they re trying to figure out exactly if there s any factual basis to them. we hear from john tester, he s the top democrat on the senate veterans committee, and he told us this, that he s going to tell his staff, to give them enough time to do as much as they can in the next 48 hours, see what they can come up with. and he asked if the allegations are troubling, he told my colleagues on the hill today, if true, they could be. so, is i was going to ask how soon they need to figure this out, is it that 48-hour time window? reporter: there s not a lot of tim
a patriotic russia great russia for a strong russia but for russia without substantiating and without corruption of course and what i would perhaps also say that oligarchs living in the. robin says on december the twenty fourth twenty seventeen no boundary was nominated as an independent presidential candidate it was more of a symbolic act nevertheless as required by electoral law in each town at least five hundred people turned up in the evening a valley went to the central electoral commission to hand in the necessary papers for nomination but that s merely the first step towards being registered as a candidate. it is impossible for our candidacy not to be approved and i lecture with that just wouldn t be an election right i mean. confirmation that i am not standing against my own will. on december the twenty
and there was handwritten notes from a conversation that reince priebus had had with the president on april 11th in which the president discussed with him the conversation that he had had with comey and how trump said comey said that the white house needed to reach out the dana bente, athe acting attorney general. these substantiated what comey was saying in the memos that led trump to have a conversation with reince priebus about it. that is what the evidence that mueller has that shows that these events that comey has described indeed occurred. as we know, the white house has said that comey s a liar and he made these things up. so in terms of substantiating, understanding whether what comey said is true, this gets mueller closer to that. does that get you closer to an obstruction case? that s a much more complex legal question but in terms of the facts, this bolsters comey s claims. michael, let me be specific with you about that. in terms of what reince priebus