go stuff it. i do believe if you re subpoenaed, you should show up.. that s part of the justice system. s when you talk about a 97% conviction rate, that s not a nicely balanced scale of justice. they are like so. that s one problem. another is, these folks who get brought in for these discussions brought up to the capitol hill for hearings, they bring lawyers in. it costs lot of money. if sam nunberg has any sense, he ll go down there with an attorney. it s going to cost him a lot of money. i ve got a friend of mine. he literally is tapping into his children s college fund in order for him to pay the legal bills and go and testify on capitol hill on all this. we talk on the phone. he s quite distraught about this. huge expense he s faced just to testify. mark: isn t that what s outrageous about this. let s say you have one lawyer or two or five lawyers. the federal government, bob mueller, has 105 lawyers. you can t compete. if they run out of money, they can print more money. i
toward tax reform by passing a budget resolution. my loser is the anti-gun left which once again is trying to use a tragedy to advance a political agenda. i predict, as before, the american people will tell them to go stuff it. bret: all right. we were hoping that the washington nationals are the winner, sorry, cubs fans. it s that time. notable quotables to wrap
toward tax reform by passing a budget resolution. my loser is the anti-gun left which once again is trying to use a tragedy to advance a political agenda. i predict, as before, the american people will tell them to go stuff it. bret: all right. we were hoping that the washington nationals are the winner, sorry, cubs fans. it s that time. notable quotables to wrap up the week after the break. breathe right. our recent online sales success seems a little. strange?nk
congress of the united states and its legitimate function, and they showed it in their attitude. but what s so extraordinary about it is here we have the congress of the united states, for a change, a committee really trying to do its job, trying to sift through facts, really being meticulous. that is a rare event. all of us would probably agree. and these guys go up there and try to stiff them. it s appalling. phil, do you see it the same way? heck no, 180 degrees different. i can tell you what i would have done, and i would have said stuff it for three reasons. number one, which committee do you want me to talk to? judiciary, government affairs, intel? you want me to talk to the senate and the house? this is about partly not the prime of your point, but partly dysfunction of the congress. how many conversations am i going to have? have you coordinated with director mueller? how am i supposed to talk to you and go talk to the federal investigator over at the fbi? and the third a
to figure out what to do. congresswoman sheila jackson-lee just convened a meetinging of what steps could be taken. they had constitutional lawyers, constitutional scholars as to what the judiciary committee could do in case there is found to be an abuse of power. and this session we didn t see much come out of it. but the question is, how far will they dig? what can they get from this? carl, how unusual was this today? it was an appalling moment. their absolute contempt for the copping of the united states and they showed it in their attitude. what s so extraordinary about it here we have the congress of the yunited states for a change, a committee really trying to do its job, trying to sift through facts, really being meticulous. that is a rare event, all of us would probably agree, and these guys go up there and try to stiff them. it s appalling. phil, do you see it the same way? heck no. 180 degrees different. i would have said stuff it for