Ubiquitous, more and if were not carrying it on ourselves personally, nor were being watched by somebody else who has a reason to do that for us. When it becomes that ubiquitous, when the chair becomes smart, the water glass becomes smart, is it useful to think of that as Information Technology or is this a new state of being and how does hewlettpackard make any money off this . The question is, who controls all of the information, whether its individuals, the government, the companies themselves. I think we have time for one more question. Before we take this one, i want to remind all participants thats meeting has been on the record so everything said will be held against you in a court of law. Yes, in the white jacket. Im emmy with the Johns Hopkins applied physics lab. Can you talk about the educational of policymakers on the state of the science and scientists on the state of policy and how to make sure theres not a gap between the two communities. Good final question. Im less int
Billion dollars. 36 is spent on medical programs. You can see this chart comes from the veterans affairs. Is that enough money . Telling me now that only 41 went medical care. This is a lopsided perspective. Were wasted onrs to conferences in orlando. Hr executiveave an testified to where the money theyre creative throwing money down the drain on nonmedical related issues. The should be going to Service Benefits such as funeral and education benefits. When your overhead is overwhelming your product, no Organization Works like that. No fortune 500 Company Works like that. Your overhead should be sucking and train in out not be sucking and training out your revenue. They had an increase of over 60 since 2009 creative it has doubled since 2001. They got everything they wanted from congress. This is not a money issue. It is a budget issue next to dod. Host a tweet guest that is all they are supposed to be taking care of. There are 22. 5 billion veterans in this country 22. 5 million vetera
Of temperament, he was a shy person. But it also had a political purpose. He knew that if he didnt talk a lot, people would stop talking. And, of course, a president or a political leader is constantly bombarded with requests, and his silence was his way of not giving in to special interests, and he articulated that quite explicitly. Amity shlaes will take your calls, emails and tweets in depth, live for three hours sunday at noon eastern on cspan2s booktv. This month the fcc voted 32 to proceed on a proposal that could allow content providers like netflix to pay for faster internet service. Later today, the Progressive Policy Institute will look at the proposal and what it could mean to consumers. Join us for live coverage at noon eastern here on cspan2. Facebook chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg recently updated her bestselling book lean in, adding career advice for college graduates. The First Edition was inspired by a commencement address she gave in 2011 at barnard college.
Whats creating that has been a phenomenon. Its only fair well off. They have to do two things, shrink and we have to bring the tuition cost down. That will counter the trend towards of the profession to be a justice politics and the demand of professionalism. Can you describe what you mean by that . Guest the book takes on those topics so in one chapter i offer that the law schools failed of their students and society by not centering on the justice as a topic of scholarship and teaching. We teach the law nothing about what the justice demands and requires so we need to address that and i think we can do that without a pindolol school as we know at. For various reasons they have neglected to study what i call the political route of law that in fact is the product of politics and so we need to study politics by not studying it we contribute to the tendency to denigrate politics. In other words in law school we tend to think and teach that its the domain of the rational and the principle
Well, first, i want to thank the new America Foundation for having us. I am particular and very honored to be a moderator because up until now, this late date in my career, no ones ever found my moderate enough in my views to be a moderators. [laughter] im really happy tonight, the first time i like to moderate a panel, and its, obviously, a great honor to talk about this on the 50th anniversary, and, obviously, its a book that has put this bark on the culture and its a very, very rare book that makes the argument that it changed peoples lives. Its under criticism for affecting a group of small people for not talking about working class women who had no choice but to work all along and not talking about people of other sexual preferences finding themselves askew or outside conventional life. What i want to do today is talk about the ongoing power of the classic, and i recently taught this book to the undergrads at nyu who some of a couple here in the audience who did not ever hesitate