having a good product. if you have good coffee, good location, good experience, people will talk about it. that said, you want to try to get the word out besides every one customer at a time. i say the younger the company, the more intimate the relationship you need with marketing. if you ve been around for a while, you can use newsletters or other things. but now you need to be superlocal, talk to one customer at a time. create an event once a month where people talk about first friday, you go to this coffee shop to get a 50% discount and that sort of consistency can get people to come more often. maybe make a partnership. go to the hair salon and say i ll give you free coffee for a week and you can serve it to customers as they get their hair done. that s a great idea. i feel like local businesses, the ones that really work together seem to be working the best on these kind of main street type businesses. and ones that work within the community, having a loyalty program is al
the crime? well, ultimately the jurors are the triers of fact, and you want to be able as a prosecutor be able to put them in the middle of things to judge what a witness is saying, a witness credibility, sort of the space, whether or not the testimony sounds appropriate, according to the crime scene, and so i think while unusual, it s really not unprecedented. is really isn t unheard of, for lawyers to want to visit the crime scene, in o.j. s case, the criminal and civil case, jurors visit the crime scene, phil spector, the jurors visit the crime scene, and i think that it actually can be quite helpful for a jury to be right there where something is alleged to have happened. the defense asking that the jurors remain anonymous, but jurors always remain anonymous, don t they? well, they do. but there are juror lists and oftentimes the identities of the
but these cases turn on who do you believe? these are about the triers of fact. and what s really insulting about the cases overturned, these generals have picked the juries. so in the cases, the people who listen to the witnesses and decided who was telling the truth were the hand-picked jurors of the generals and then even in spite of that, the generals went ahead and said, you know, i wasn t in the courtroom and i didn t hear the testimony and i didn t have the advantage as you had in listening to the testimony and deciding the credibility of the witnesses, i m going to super impose my judgment. so i do not believe a general should ever be able to overturn a court-martial decision by a jury. and i think we need to make that change. there are other changes that need to be made too to help support the victim and make sure that the victim s voice is heard in the process. in terms of the kind those kind of concrete suggestions that have been made for improving the process for suppor
should there be changes so that, for example, air force generals cannot wade in and personally decide to overturn jury verdicts in court-martials to reinstate people convicted of sexual assault? should there be changes to policies like that? absolutely. there need to be some changes. i don t think we need to wholesale change the uniform coded military justice. but these cases turn on who do you believe? these are about the triers of fact. and what s really insulting about the cases overturned, these generals have picked the juries. so in the cases, the people who listen to the witnesses and decided who was telling the truth were the hand-picked jurors of the generals and then even in spite of that, the generals went ahead and said, you know, i wasn t in the courtroom and i didn t hear the testimony and i didn t have the advantage as you had in listening to the testimony and deciding the credibility of the witnesses, i m going to super impose my judgment. so i do not believe a general
should there be structural changes to address that? should sexual assault and related crimes be treated outside the chain of command in the terms of the way they are adjudicated? should there be changes so that, for example, air force generals cannot wade in and personally decide to overturn jury verdicts in court-martials to reinstate people convicted of sexual assault? should there be changes to policies like that? absolutely. there need to be some changes. i don t think we need to wholesale change the uniform coded military justice. but these cases turn on who do you believe? these are about the triers of fact. and what s really insulting about the cases overturned, these generals have picked the juries. so in the cases, the people who listen to the witnesses and decided who was telling the truth were the hand-picked jurors of the generals and then even in spite of that, the generals went ahead and said, you know, i wasn t in the courtroom and i didn t hear the testimony and i d