to earn tens of millions of dollars under a conservatorship, but 13 miles down the road at venice beach you have an encampment that is an insane-asylum. and they don t put a conservatorship on those people. clearly the insider you spoke to is spot on. where there is this amount of money, people are not going to let go. jesse: you can t institutionalized some deranged maniac destroying the streets. you institutionalize a platinum selling pop star and hold her in a financial straightjacket and bleed her dry of her cash and don t let her out. if she says i m fine, i m note going to another institution, they say you are being uncooperative.
to earn tens of millions of dollars under a conservatorship, but 13 miles down the road at venice beach you have an encampment that is an insane-asylum. and they don t put a conservatorship on those people. clearly the insider you spoke to is spot on. where there is this amount of money, people are not going to let go. jesse: you can t institutionalized some deranged maniac destroying the streets. you institutionalize a platinum selling pop star and hold her in a financial straightjacket and bleed her dry of her cash and don t let her out. if she says i m fine, i m note going to another institution, they say you are being uncooperative.
to earn tens of millions of dollars under a conservatorship, but 13 miles down the road at venice beach you have an encampment that is an insane-asylum. and they don t put a conservatorship on those people. clearly the insider you spoke to is spot on. where there is this amount of money, people are not going to let go. jesse: you can t institutionalized some deranged maniac destroying the streets. you institutionalize a platinum selling pop star and hold her in a financial straightjacket and bleed her dry of her cash and don t let her out. if she says i m fine, i m note going to another institution, they say you are being uncooperative.
either fire who would either fire mueller or who would constrain the investigation. as congressman jamie raskin said, at that point it could be the guillotine, fire mueller, or the straightjacket, put him in a straightjacket then constrain what he can investigate or the way he can investigate it. and that would be an improper purpose. you have no doubt that the only reason to fire rosenstein would be to either constrain the investigation of mueller s investigation or to fire mueller? i have no doubt of that, and the president has telegraphed that. he s made it very clear in his recent comments that he thinks that the investigation is, as he calls it, a witch hunt, that he thinks it s improper and wants to stop it and he s threatened to fire rosenstein and mueller for just that purpose. by the way, if he did so for that purpose, that would be if he fired rosenstein or mueller at this point, i think it would be safe to say that would be very clearly a crime, it would be an obstru
rod rosenstein, do you think that s laying the groundwork for him to be fired? well, i hadn t heard that, but it certainly would sound as if that s the case. you introduced legislation to protect robert mueller today which is a companion bill to the senate s legislation. do you think it would be equally egregious for the president to fire rosenstein as it would be to fire mueller? yes, because the purpose of firing rosenstein would be to put in someone else who would either fire who would either fire mueller or who would constrain the investigation. as congressman jamie raskin said, at that point it could be the guillotine, fire mueller, or the straightjacket, put him in a straightjacket then constrain why he can investigate or the way he can investigate it. and that would be an improper purpose. you have no doubt that the only reason to fire rosenstein would be to either constrain the investigation of mueller s investigation or to fire mueller? i have no doubt of that, and