The New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group, has filed its opening brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Press release content from Globe Newswire. The AP news staff was not involved in its creation.
NCLA Challenges Constitutionality of CFPB’s Unique, Congress-Free Funding Structure
New Civil Liberties AllianceMarch 8, 2021 GMT
Washington, D.C., March 08, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) The New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group, has filed its opening brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the case of
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection v. Law Offices of Crystal Moroney, P.C. NCLA argues that the district court erred when it allowed CFPB to enforce a second Civil Investigative Demand (CID) against Ms. Moroney’s firm because the agency’s funding mechanism is unconstitutional. Given Congress’ unprecedented, broad delegation of appropriations authority to the President and CFPB, this case may ultimately provide the U.S. Supreme Court the opportunity to reinvigorate the Nondelegation Doctrine that five justices
democrats make a can compelling case to republican ears that this rises to the level of impeachment. if they find high crimes and misdemeanorer misdemeanors, you re going to see members move that way. if you don t, it s going to be a political manure show as my mother would say. she would never say that. like everything through the looking glass, the president lost in district court today. is that a loss? no, says his attorney. it s a win because they got a stay pending appeal. one of his main counselors says no, i got wrong and what we re trying to do on taxes, we want to see them. that s wrong and what s happening with imeachment, that s wrong. so the case from counsel next. (amber jagger) if we don t give students from an underserved background
but that decision was stayed pending appeal. big win says the president s attorney and he says impeachment will be a big win as well. counsel joins us tonight. thank you as always. thanks for having me. help me understand this. how is it the district court saying i reject all of your arguments. tunch over the tax as win? it s a win because the u.s. court of appeals immediately within literally ten minutes of filing the application state granted it and the unique issues raised by this appeal because it s the constitutional issues we raised. i want to say something. there are 5,000 da s and assistant district attorneys in the united states. decan you imagine if the president of the united states
it is a national security matter, he is talking about safety of the kucountry, second congress has we found out they have ruled against trump. against reinstating the travel ban. that s victory for the state. kwily go to airy do you have the ruling. i read directionally from the ruling, saying the emergency motion for stay pending appeal is denied. that means that this ban remains blocked. the way it written as written by the lower court. we mentioned moments ago. this broad blockage of entire oerp executive order. that remains the case. is it all three judges agree.