Case challenging Prime Minister borussia else in suspension of parliament and whether his advice to the queen to do so was justifiable. Critics claim the Prime Minister did this to avoid opposition to his brexit plan. The British Parliament is scheduled to return on october 14, roughly two weeks before the deadline for the u. K. To leave the European Union. Milady, milord. Issue was nonjustifiable because of what was political. It was political for two reasons. One was that it trespassed on the proper province of the executive and the other was the lack of judicial or manageable standard. Be charm. T could i paraphrase, of course, from case. Inion in another much reference has been made to constitutional principle. Constitutional principle may embrace legal rules, but it may also embrace convention. Convention that is not amenable to enforcement in a court of law , and an example of that was reference tor 1 in the convention which was expressed in reform but nevertheless remained the c
Hello, yes indeed. Also. You will be talking about how people are reacting here in stoke on trent to the tumultuous events of the last few days concerning brexit and the vitriol that has been expressed by both sides. I shall talk to you shortly. Also this afternoon President Trumps top intelligence official faces congress over a whistleblower complaint that sparked an impeachment inquiry. Coming up on afternoon live, all the sport with holly hamilton. 242 with 2a2 with england at the world cup and a conference victory over the United States put them top of the group. All reaction to 30 pm. At 2 30pm. Thanks, holly. Stav danaos has all the weather. Into the weekend, we could be looking at a potent area of low pressure, heavy rain on saturday night into sunday with also some strong winds as well, all the details a bit later on. Thanks, stav. Also coming up the duke and duchess of cambridge are to name the uks new Polar Research ship. No, not Boaty Mcboatface, but the sir david attenborou
Milady, milord. Issue was nonjustifiable because of what was political. It was political for two reasons. One was that it trespassed on the proper province of the executive and the other was the lack of judicial or manageable standard. Be charm. T could i paraphrase, of course, from case. Inion in another much reference has been made to constitutional principle. Constitutional principle may embrace legal rules, but it may also embrace convention. Convention that is not amenable to enforcement in a court of law , and an example of that was reference tor 1 in the convention which was expressed in reform but nevertheless remained the convention after that event. Proceed receive under the heading of constitutional principle, there has to be an element of legal , and if you take the example that was cited in the unison case, one could clearly identify that the legal right of access to justice, and therefore rely upon that in order to determine the declaration of a right and the enforcement
Is causing huge problems, so, yes, oui is causing huge problems, so, yes, our constitution is being stress tested by the necessity to proceed with brexit. Do you agree with that, alison, and if it is being tested, almost to destruction, what do we need to do about that . Is that something the Supreme Court is going to address this week, potentially . |i do to address this week, potentially . do accept that it is being tested, andi do accept that it is being tested, and i think it is because you are in and i think it is because you are in a very difficult situation, you have an issue that is very divisive, very strong opinions on both sides, and you have a strict time limit set out by the legal requirements of the European Union, so i can see the pressure, but at the same time if you are going to start thinking about a new written constitution, you need to think very carefully about what those principles should be and how they should work, and i dont think that is a job for the Supreme
My lady, my lords. The issue was not justifiable because it was political. It was political for two reasons. Reasons. One was that it trespassed on the proper province of the executives, and the other was the lack of judicial or standards. By which it could be determined. I paraphrase of course from the opinion of the assumption and hobbs and another case. Much reference has been made to constitutional principle. Constitutional principle may embracebr legal rules but it may also embrace convention. Convention that is not amenable to enforcement in a court of law. And an example of that was seen in miller one in reference to the convention which was expressed in statute four but nevertheless, remained the convention. In order to proceed under the heading of constitutional principle, there has to be an element of legal content, and if you take the example that was cited by my learned friend, the unison case, there went could clearly identify that the legal right of access to justice and,