all sorts of software to review the hundreds of thousands of e-mails. this is the bottom line conclusion. based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in july with respect to secretary clinton. so where does the trump campaign go from here, jason? are we going to hear directly from donald trump speak about this? he spoke an hour or so ago. didn t refer to it. in his next appearance, will we hear him say anything about this. i would expect mr. trump to bring this up on the campaign trail. i would expect mr. trump to bring up the fact there is an active, ongoing investigation into the clinton foundation. and the fact we have this rigged system. this has stunk from the beginning. there should have been charges brought against secretary clinton. one thing i d ask is if this were to happen to anybody else, if there were a spouse of a state department staffer or employee who shared this confidential information or
interviews he s going to maybe 10 max out of 53 and at least half of them are with clinton, specifically with people who are clinton allies. the message there doesn t suggest this is an evenly weighted investigative process. he is primarily looking at these people who are all former or current clinton allies. what does that tell you? what struck me the most was the contrast between micro-month rell of the cia whose interview he didn t atent and brian pagliano who is a fairly as i understand it not particularly high-level state department staffer who is the person who set up the server that has been in question and who again, i may be wrong and you can correct me here, had nothing to do with the response to benghazi. don t forget, today they brought in huma abedin, hillary clinton s top aide, who was not involved in this at all. the reasoning for bringing her in was purely because she works for hillary clinton. so she doesn t have any direct
gowdy has been focused on those allies in closed-door benghazi meetings. a source telling them there have been 53 interviews and depositions with witnesses called in for gowdy s probe. gowdy has attended fewer than 10 of the 53. but the interviews, which were described by the huffington post as staff led, that gowdy has attended include cheryl mills, clinton s chief of staff when she was secretary of state. jaiblg jake sullivan, clinton s former deputy chief of staff and current adviser. sidney blumenthal, long-time clinton adviser. and brian pag lano, a state department staffer. we should note that gowdy did not attend the interview of huma abedin. other excite witness interviews that gowdy did not go to according to the huffington post, three of the four diplomatic security agents who actually survived the attack. also cia deputy director michael morel and former department intelligence agent michael flynn. . a spokesperson for the council say gowdy has attended to far more matters t
that s the question as a state department staffer. he says he will plead the fifth and avoid self-incrimination. what can we expect? what will happen, what will not happen? mag new reports that the pentagon may have cooked the books in the battle against isis. more than 50 intelligence analysts are reportedly complaining that their assessments were changed to create a false impression that the united states and coalition partners are winning the fight against the islamic state. the report goes on to say the cannister within the senior level of the intelligence
that s bad. i obviously paid for those services and did so because during a period of time, we continued to need his technical assistance. and according the judge, that puts hillary clinton in even hotter water than before. it does. and first the political side. i think the democrats are beginning to recognize that she may not be electable. what she admitted on friday is that she paid a state department staffer, who had already received his own briefing on how to maintain and secure classified information to avoid and evade the state department protection of classified information. guess what that s called? that s called a conspiracy to evade the espionage laws. she s unwittingly or wittingly