institutions achieving to be involved in the electoral process. but i think that s vastly different than whether or not there was a difference in the outcome of the election. this is a there were discloches about e-mails frankly the other nos getting talked to. the only reason we re talking about this, john pedestrian prd and tandon and others on the left said things in e-mails they wished hadn t come out. if they hadn t behaved the way they did, none of this would have happened. they wrote the e-mails had a secret server, didn t put proper means in place, and not disqualifying the second piece of this. but we keep forgets then had a secret serve r, didn t abide by rules and regulations set by the government and state department to ensure that some of this kind of stuff wouldn t happen. that s been lost in this discussion. i know you ve got do go. one quick question, button this up about hacking of republican institutions.
this litest wikileaks data dump shows one clinton ally and her campaign chairman allegedly clashed over the e-mail server. the reported conversation took place where tandon writes, i highly recommend she, meaning clinton, start making other more positive news soon. podesta sarcastically responds, really, that s great advice, calling out several staffers saying speaking of transparticipant si our friends david kendall, cheryl mills, and filip weren t forthcoming on the facts, all threed worked with clinton, adding this is a cheryl special, i know you love her, but this stuff is like her achilles heel or kryptonite, she just can t say no to this. later asked why clinton s team didn t get information about the server out sooner before responding, i guess i know the answer, they wanted to get away with it. donald trump of on the trail in florida yesterday and in sync