Premier Brian Pallister speaks at an earlier press conference. (Screenshot: Manitoba Government/YouTube)
Article continues below advertisement ↴
A number of Manitoba churches are taking the province and Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Brent Roussin to court this week.
The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is representing a long list of churches in the lawsuit, which includes Gateway Bible Baptist Church, Pembina Valley Baptist Church, Redeeming Grace Bible Church, Grace Covenant Church, Slavic Baptist Church, Christian Church of Morden, Bible Baptist Church. A church minister, a deacon, the owners of a restaurant in Winkler, Manitoba, and an individual fined for attending a rally in Steinbach, Man. have also joined the suit.
NOW Magazine
Facial Recognition: A pathway or threat to our future
Facial Recognition: A pathway or threat to our future by 99 99 people viewed this event.
CFE Virtual Forum Series. Millions use facial recognition technology daily to unlock smartphones and tag friends in photos. But the same technology is viewed by many as a threat to human rights and civil liberties. IBM has gotten out of the facial recognition business altogether, and Amazon and Microsoft have refused to make their facial recognition technology to the police. Can it be regulated and safely used or should it be fully or partially banned? Join a panel of experts in conversation about this technology and what should be done.
fbi report. told fbi informant we ll use christopher steele they have not told christopher steele what s in there. they goal after him a little bit. steve: it had been redacted. brian: now it s. in we will see his name in the report. steele compiled the does yea wdossier.he has a reputation ofg honest but chasing down leads of people said were not leads in the past. ainsley: want to know how was this fisa warrant signed over and over and over when fisa the foreign surveillance act. other in the judiciary committee you talked about the council, steve. the panel is going to hear a presentation from these councils. each of these lawyers, the first one is a democratic staff lawyer. he is going to be talking about adam schiff impeachment report. another staff report, who san aide to jerry nadler is going to explain the democrats outlook from a constitutional basis.
make a statement, devon nunes burisma, soon after that, in a briefing call with the national security staff of the office of the top republican will make a the vice president in february of 2015, i raised my concern statement. the two witness george mirl and that hunter biden s status as a george kent will be sworn in, they will have opening board member would korea it the statements as welt. perception of a conflict of then the questioning will begin and we are told that daniel interests. let me be clear, however, i did goldman one of the staff attorneys for the house not witness any effort by any intelligence a former u.s. u.s. official to shield burisma assistant attorney southern from scrutiny. district of new york, he ll do the questioning for maybe as in fact. other advocated a scuttling of long as 45 minutes uninterrupted on behalf of the democrats and the founder as well as holding steve castor will do the same, a the corrupt prosecutors who staff lawyer for the house closed th
view from here in the states. he was in a lot of those halt the execution. meetings that were happening in real time. reed s family is speaking out, george kent told house leading the fight to save his investigators that president trump, he was told, wanted life. what gives you hope? nothing less than president the truth and the support zelensky to go to a microphone from all over the world. and say investigations biden and reporter: rodney reed s clinton. so house democrats have control mother and brother holding on over the witnesses and over the with time running out for him on format. and this hearing tomorrow will death row. more than 2 million people look a lot unlike any other including a-list activistion congressional hearing that we ve seen for the last, what, 10 to backing reed on social media, 15 years. after the opening statements, convinced new witnesses an house democrats and republicans evidence will prove his will get to split 90 minutes innocence. it s just up