Exploring issues that affect leaders in the U. S. And around the globe. About. Can the legal system resist a Political Campaign led by the president of the United States. My favorite weird anecdote of yesterday, at One Point Giuliani was running out of so many people to talk to, he had to talk to a fellow lawyer. Jay sekulow had a radio show. Here is jay sekulow interviewing Rudy Giuliani, his boss as the attorney. Listen. Mayor, i know youve said and ive said we want to see this come to closure soon here. Mayor . Yeah, we do. Its about time that it ends. I also think, and i hope the Special Counsel is as sensitive to it as we are. We do not want to run into the november elections. So back up from that. This should be over with by September 1st. Is that a threat . Look, its throwing everything at the wall and trying to see what sticks. I think everything thats said here is correct. This is a political messaging campaign, but its not without peril, right . Everything Rudy Giuliani said
person at mar-a-lago, including, you know, maintenance staff and including people that work on the grounds has been interviewed that may be a convenience, but maybe that s a crazy stupid way of thinking about it. could that grand jury there have been convened for something else? so, just so you know, you shouldn t feel too bad because a lot of lawyers do a lot of spitballing also and we can get it wrong as well. so, you know, it s not unique to nonlawyers to be doing this sort of educated guessing. i think there are two possibilities with respect to what we re hearing about also getting a florida grand jury. one possibility is all of the charges against donald trump will be brought in florida. it seems by all accounts there would be venue for all of the charges. just to be a little bit of a nerd, the constitution requires that a crime be charged where it
the bbc is funded. it s funded through the licence fee. it s paid for by the british public. and he responded. he responded first of alljust saying, 0h, do you think this label is inaccurate? and then he came up with a suggestion himself. he said, maybe the accounts themselves should link to the sourcing of funding. i then pushed him on that and he gave me a much sort of longer e mail. he said, we are aiming for maximum transparency and accuracy, linking to ownership and source of funds probably makes sense. i do think media organisations should be self aware and not falsely claim the complete absence of bias. all organisations have bias, some obviously, much more than others. i should note that i follow bbc news on twitter because i think it is among the least biased. now, i think what you get an impression of there is that this is policy that is not defined yet. this is most certainly spitballing. it is policy on the hoof. he is thinking, he is being
much more than others. i should note that i follow bbc news on twitter because i think it is among the least bias. it is among the least biased. now, i think what you get an impression of there is that this is policy that is not defined yet. this is most certainly spitballing. it is policy on the hoof. he is thinking, he is being inquisitive about what to do with accounts like the bbc s. the problem is, the label has already been attached to the bbc s. one of the bbc s twitter accounts. and you ve seen this with other media organisations as well. so you have npr, national public radio. a few days ago, that was labelled as state affiliated media , akin to russia today. now, that has now been taken down because that simply isn t true. but what you re seeing is, once again, elon musk sort of riffing, making policy up as he goes along. now, sometimes, that can be really effective in business,
for maximum transparency and accuracy. linking to ownership and source of funds probably makes sense. i do think media organisations should be self aware and not falsely claim the complete absence of bias. all organisations have bias, some obviously, much more than others. i should note that i follow bbc news on twitter because i think it is among the least biased. now, i think what you get an impression of there is that this is policy that is not defined yet. this is most certainly spitballing. it is policy on the hoof. he is thinking, he is being inquisitive about what to do with accounts like the bbc s. the problem is, the label has already been attached to the bbc s. one of the bbc s twitter accounts. and you ve seen this with other media organisations as well. so you have npr, national public radio. a few days ago, that was labelled as state affiliated media , akin to russia today.