would you? all he e eats is cream of wheat and kaopectate. she s supposed to be less popular than him and that s the reason why he s in the office and criticism about her has suddenly shifted. now they re saying she doesn t rise to the occasion and she had this competence but it hasn t been shown; right. it takes the stink off joe because joe assumed she was capable. it s on her for not stepping up. that s different than saying i screwed the pooch by hiring this cackling deadbeat. her speech pattern will be studied by scholars for centuries and she uses words as punksuation and pauses but neves and never uses words and the thinnest gruel of l linguistic helper and she has to use the same words over and over again
democracy, disclosed contacts between the white house and the department of justice. we can go through the list and there is nothing there that strikes me as massively radical or even particularly partisan. but professor murray is right, we have come to realize that a democracy that depends just on norms and traditions and is not caudiied is at the whim of a president who is prepared to abuse those traditions. katty, i don t want to make light of it, but i will say it s a well-known speech pattern that if somebody says to you, look, i m not perfect, but you kind of start to say, okay, where are we going with this? the united states in some ways has been an example on the world stage, but i don t think anyone with an objective view thinks our democracy is anywhere near perfect. it looks very damaged, and deliberately so within the
are the advocates of the child tax credits that democrats are putting forward. i think you lay it out well. it is not a surprise that i think raise discriminatory behind the speech pattern if you will. whether or not those book reviews, chai, were written by people with kids, i can t say because i don t know and i don t care. good to see you, sir. good to see you, ari. absolutely. we have a lot more to come including an exclusive interview, you see him there,
tweeted down, then tweeted a mangled explanation, and i m quoting now, or at least i m trying to, ives apology for a video that is allegedly a caricature of an otherwise halting speech pattern she should first stop and apologize for saying the president needs an intervention are. if you were trying to make out your opponent as drunk or incoherent, probably not great to send out an actually incoherent tweet. he also included a visual aid. i want to show you there, the photograph he included with the tweet, some basketball players throwing their hands in the air. not sure why. more on mr. giuliani shortly. as for the president himself, here s what he said on the way to japan. mr. president, has your relationship with nancy pelosi soured to the point of being too personal and some of these altered videos that are being disseminated, is that going too far? well, i don t know about the videos. i can tell you that what i m here is to help the country. that s why i did this.