times. justice jackson: no. i m not going to that. let me just say so your point is that there is no ambiguity with having a list and not having president in it with having a history that suggest that they were really focused on local concerns in the south with this conversation where the legislators actually discussed you are saying there is no they vote. justice jackson: i m talking about the barred office part of this. jason murray: barred office is if you want to include everybody first presidential electors they are not offices so they wouldn t fall under any office. second of all senators and representatives don t hold office either. the tells us under the incompatibility clause refers to them as holding seats not offices. you want to make sure there is no doubt that senators and representatives are covered given that the constitution suggests otherwise, you have to include them. the constitution says the presidency holds an office as do members of this court. and
game. we begin with the high-stakes summit where nato leaders are discussing a possible place for ukraine in the alliance s future. kevin corke has all the latest developments including what is upsetting ukraine s president. kevin: as you know from your time covering previous nato summit, there are lots are one-on-one breakouts of the sidelines. so this is hardly novel. but very few in recent memory will be as anticipated as the one that is set for tomorrow between president zelenskyy and our own president biden. the meeting comes against a backdrop of controversy given by the prophets recent decision to send cluster munitions to the war-torn country which a number of nato members have effectively banned because of concerns over the weapon s ability to harm civilians. the audience comes after mr. biden said ukraine was not ready for nato membership. so if you have been following the story for a while, that means reading which has finally cleared its last hurdle to receive n
some pretty wild posts recently on social media. recentlysocial mone of them wast the cocaine found the white house was at belonged to eithern the president or his son. are you willing to sayt or that that s not the case, that they don t belong to them? i don t have a response to that because we have to be carefuolec about the hatch act and the hatch act. they still don he hatcht know what that is. the level of security and surveillance presente leve n the white house begs the question of why they haven t locateduestion. su. is biden stonewall stonewalling yet another investigation? m to the bidens never seem to get to the bottom of anythin g. . and with a growing number of serious corruption, corruption d growinallegations, maybe it se they don t want to get to the dettom of it the bot. despite a sweetheart plea deal from biden s department of justiced e, the congressional probes into hunter bidenngressis and his family s shady dealings are ramping up evidence, evidence of
push to oust secretary mayorkas. how they got to the brink of impeachment, and what it means for the senate s border bill. then, donald trump lashing out after a court appointed monitor found more deficiencies in his company s finances. and president biden s next move in response to the attack that killed three american soldiers. a remembrance of their surface and sacrifice, as the 11th hour gets underway on this tuesday night. good evening once again. i m stephanie ruhle. good to be back here at msnbc headquarters in new york city. right now, house republicans are moving forward with their push to impeach a sitting member of president biden s cabinet. their target, homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas, who they say has failed to secure the southern border. as republicans accuse him of refusing to enforce federal immigration laws and blocking oversight of vhs. keep in mind, this is happening even as many of those same republicans are openly opposing a bipartisan b
widespread doubt and uncertainty, the united states government seems to have assumed a role similar to an orwellian ministry of truth. white house from press secretary karine jean-pierre responded on wednesday. we certainly disagree with this decision. we re going to continue to promote responsible actions to protect public health, safety and security when confronted by challenges like a deadly pandemic. our view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take action or to take account of the effects of their platforms are having to the american people. paul: let s bring in our panel, wall street journal columnists dan henninger, kim strassel and iowaly shah finley. alicia, tell us who sued the government and what they re alleging. louisiana and missouri joined by scientists and conservative activists sued the government for infringing on their free speech rights. they claim that they put pressure and coerced the platforms such as youtubing