he was on. he definitely pushes back on the video games. he said that s a debate for another day, point people to my twitter feed. i want to get your take on this. megan mccardle said something that i think is what you were saying which is, tragedies like last weekend s shootings keep happening at the current rate, the american public is eventually going to demand that the government take guns out of private hands. none of the fire walls that have worked thus far will hold. so if the right is interested in keeping its guns, it needs to get more interested in finding an alternative policy that will actually work. i think some people, defenders of the 2nd amendment would say, but the right is ours given to us in the constitution. because some people abuse it, why do we have to change our approach to that right? but how would you answer that? i agree with all of the arguments, frankly. it is unfair that you would deny somebody a right by putting a restriction in place because
indiana s, pages and pages on the history of eugenics and how birth control and abortion were aimed at eradicating people viewed as unfit or should never have been born. it is clear how he feels about this issue and if they take the case will end up putting the decision in june 2020 in front of the presidential election. we will have to wait and see. there some hesitation to take up this roe versus wade case. what we have to affirm is a woman s constitutional right to full control of her body and equalizer level of citizenship, very important because beyond giving somebody a right to have an abortion what roe versus wade does is codifies a woman being the same level of citizen as a man because i have full control of my body. for a woman if you overturn roe v wade they have no control which makes them less of a person. what she had to say in her
they realized that everything the witnesses have previously told the judiciary committee under oath under penalty of felony, they re likely to tell the fbi the same thing. it would make sense to me. but now they want to focus on judge kavanaugh s high school year book. give me a break. that just shows the sort of desperation that the other side has to not only deny the nominee a fair and dignified confirmation process, but to turn this into a three ring circus. and now we re talking about throwing ice on somebody when you were in college as disqualifying you from a seat on the united states supreme court? this has not been a search for the truth. this has been about search and destroy. and the process setting a precedent we will regret for the rest of our lives where an unproven accusation is enough to deny somebody a confirm eight in
been described as somebody a sort of governor, a sort of brake pedal for the president for some of his strongest impulses when it comes to the russia investigation in particular. are these things linked? it s such a good question because i love your use of the word governor in this instance. it s true there there are a lot of people and don mcgahn probably is among the top three who have barred the door from the president acting on his worst impulses. however, i don t think that it is linked. i do believe don mcgahn s sort of message that he really was kind of done, i think there s something bigger going on inside the white house counsel and larger even in the white house which is people are tired. people are tired of the drama and at tilting and the careering and the daily sort of rush, rush, hurry up and wait and everything falls apart. a lot of things done on the whim of the president that wear
the security area but after she was handed her passport from her tour guides. you say that s significant. tell me why. i say that s significant because had the little girl gone through the security checkpoint, someone without a ticket, the unidentified adult, she could not have gone through the security checkpoint. what the little 12-year-old would have had to do is to make a u-turn and come back through the security checkpoint and pass by the tsa officers, a lone 12-year-old girl, she would have gone noted at that point and that would have raised a lot of suspicion. so whatever happened had to occur before she went through the checkpoint. secondarily, her having that passport would be important. now, obviously people will say, well, they will change the name on it, and that s true, but at least that gives somebody a template on which to make a modification like a name change. now she s got id and she didn t go through security and raise those suspicions.