closed door meetings on health care, that was fine then and not there now. guest: i am here to talk about social security. neil: you are not being consistent. if you ahead closed door meetings you should hate them all the time. guest: we have never addressed social security financing behind closed doors and outside the normal order of congress. neil: but a big thing like health care, that s fined to do behind closed doors? guest: social security is a promise to americans. and members of congress, the president, ought to respect very importantly that we need to keep that promise if we cut it they cut it at their own peril and the voters will not were happy, republicans or democrats. neil: thank you very much. i don t mean to jump on you we have a lot more coming up including a wheel barrel.
there. our nominee has to be someone who isn t committed to abolishing social security, but who is committed to saving social security. regardless of what anyone says, oh, it s not and that s provocative language, maybe it s time to have some provocative language in this country. what about that? the ponzi scheme and also, rick perry going back to creationism and challenging the science on not only evolution but also on climate change. i think the two bites that you just played, andrea, frame the question for the republican primary. there s no question that what rick perry is saying and the vehemence with which he s saying it will play in the primary. barack obama will hit him hard should he become the nominee. the question is in a republican primary, will rick perry come across as somebody telling the truth about social security financing and the fact that the financing doesn t add up over the long run? this is an argument that many republican politicians make. they don t make