place that it s going to happen, it s going to happen here. because new yorkers in general, i mean, we may have opinions, but i feel like we set the tone for are fair and equity. that s what we do clearly our justice system as being attacked. i think it s up to us to defend it, to defend due process, and to defend the rule of law against all of its enemies so now, even some conservatives we spoke to said that they thought didn t like gettier. the trial, but they thought it could get a fair trial and all the manhattan is we spoke to said that they weren t concerned about their personal safety, that they trusted the system and puffy be fine. but given everything that s happened this week, downtown manhattan, one has to wonder if they were actually on that jury if they feel the same anderson, we ve got more cash. thanks so much perspective now from former trump campaign adviser davidai urban and norm eisen, who investigated trump has counsel to house democrats in the first impeachment
had those same feelings about joe biden? joe biden was on trial all right. the other side would be losing there minds right. about getting fair and having a fair and balanced trial. look, this is a very important case. i think we should we should try. they should have moved the venue. they should struck the judge. if you want to if you want to have a serious case about this, or you can just have a kangaroo court that s what s going to play out. and that s how it s going to be proceeding. he by americans norm as we mentioned, the foreign presence request for a stay of the trial pending a venue change was denied by a state appeals judge. today, trump s attorney argued that seating a jury this quickly in this climate was so many prospective jurors being dismissed over bias or self acknowledged bias or should point out was untenable does that logic makes sense or does it i mean, i guess there s a counter argument which is that it shows the process works as intended by weeding out those wit
states. in colorado and maine, they offered to remove trump from the ballot, but the other states, largely on procedural grounds, without getting into the merits, have kept him on the ballot. but they ve also left open the possibility that this could be litigated through the general election. so anderson, unless the supreme court really steps in here and provides some guidance to the states on the meaning of this section, this is an issue that could hang over the entire 2024 race. when do we expect trump to file his appeal in the colorado case? well anderson, i ve been on the phone for a large part of the day, trying to get an answer to that very question. what i can tell you is that it s been two weeks since colorado s supreme court removed trump from the ballot. and in that decision, they gave a deadline of january 4th, for an appeal to beef out. they said look, if someone files an appeal here, then this will be state, he will appear on the primary ballot until the supreme court
country. what s the best thing for the country, it would be to pardon seek and move on as a country. well i mean that s just her doing what she does, which is she doesn t want to offend anyone. the fact is she knows better, as a governor. you can t make these decisions on pardons before you hear what the trial is, what the evidence is. you made the point in the past though, that a pardon requires remorse, it requires an acknowledgment of what you did was wrong. yeah, acceptance of responsibility is what a pardon requires. he will never accept responsibility, he never, has he never will. so look, she s pandering. and look. she s running to be vice president? i think should be more than happy to take. it and, my evidence for that, anderson, is that she won t say she wouldn t. now i mean, ron desantis has said under no circumstance has he taken, i ve said under no circumstances when i take it. why won t she say it? i mean, i think the only, reason you ve watched politics long en
fresh conspiracies about his legal troubles online. all of this with the iowa caucus is now less than two weeks away. well welcome to 2024. we re going to speak with one of his challenges shortly, former u.s. attorney chris christie joins us here. but first, the main case, cnn s paula reid starts us off. so what more do we know about the former presidents appeal? tonight, they are attacking the secretary of state of maine, shana bellis. she is a delicate, but the process in maine is that the first stop for any questions about whether someone is on the ballot, going to the secretary of state. now in their appeal tonight, they argue that she was quote, a biased decision-maker, who should ve recused herself, had no legal authority, made multiple errors of law, and acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner. and anderson, her decision was based on section three of the 14th amendment of the united states constitution. now that is part of the constitution, and who should enforce it. w