Together with singles 2007 on this park this is a big day for us. Although you may hear individual voices there are many voices. The plan before you is a meeting each attended by 50 and 80 people. Most of the meetings involved thoughtful break out sections where neighbors worked together and why they didnt use the park and what they wanted to see done whats so wonderful about the plan is most of teens can look at it and see at least one of their judges was in it. While we cant pleas one hundred percent im amazed we come together to respond to the wide varieties of yourselves. I encourage you to approve the plan and support of the logical and respectful way the plan was created thank you calling names . Im doing this because i know ill get in trouble im a homeowner on elizabeth street and been at the 3 of the 4 community meetings. I think what we need it green space people can use for the tennis court can use and i i know theres talk about enforcement but its not being enforced this is
And the overwhelming, almost unanimous choice was number 2. Shortly after that, we received invitations to this hearing from john funge and ed reiskin. And instead of what we expected, we were offered options 3 and 4. And no mention of option 2 and why it was omitted, even though it was a unanimous choice. So, it seems like we still dont have sfmtas ear for community input. And id like to encourage the organization to spend more time and concerns. I think youre going to get a good start today. But the things you have on your agenda youre going to be voting on options 3 or 4 or possibly falling back to option 1. And i think 3 or 4 would probably be reasonable. I just wanted to say if these fall through and you decide to revert back to option 1, i think youll have a lot of opposition in north beach again [inaudible]. Thank you, sir. And just as a last comment, please do stop, reinitiate communication with the neighbor. Thank you. [speaker not understood]. Stephen taylor, [speaker not und
Believe, and we were presented five options on a piece of paper like this. We reviewed them and we all voted towards the end of the meeting. And the overwhelming, almost unanimous choice was number 2. Shortly after that, we received invitations to this hearing from john funge and ed reiskin. And instead of what we expected, we were offered options 3 and 4. And no mention of option 2 and why it was omitted, even though it was a unanimous choice. So, it seems like we still dont have sfmtas ear for community input. And id like to encourage the organization to spend more time and concerns. I think youre going to get a good start today. But the things you have on your agenda youre going to be voting on options 3 or 4 or possibly falling back to option 1. And i think 3 or 4 would probably be reasonable. I just wanted to say if these fall through and you decide to revert back to option 1, i think youll have a lot of opposition in north beach again [inaudible]. Thank you, sir. And just as a la
Steve taylor. Good afternoon, mr. Fonaro. Hi, thanks for giving me time to speak. Can you hear me . First of all, i want to say that these new options that you have come up with are fabulous if, in fact, theyre going to happen. But based on this report that im reading, i dont think that they ever will. I dont think february 1st, 2013 is near enough time to take on these new options. And i think that its funny that february 1st, 2013, is probably two days before youre going to start digging the trench on columbus avenue. Also it seems like to me, based on our future or our past business together, that this is an item to a bees us when the real serious matter is paragraph 3, which says, if we cant do options 3 or 4, were going to do what we had originally intended. I think thats all i had to say. Thank you, sir. Next speaker, please. Lance carnes, steve taylor, lorenzo petroni. Mr. Carnes. Good afternoon, mr. Carnes. Yes, nice of you to hear us today, board members. Id like to underline
This project, this organization known as the mta has been using lies, trickery and deception to economically terrorize the chinatown and north beach business communities by limiting consumer accessibility, by using the construction blockade the mta has been committing larceny against these business communities and will curtail them from enjoying the economic boom from the americas cup. As we all know, this public hearing is a formality. The decision to approve this project has already been made prior to this hearing. It is a huge waste of money because you could have just run rails up concern i street instead. The polls are still there where the 16th streetcar were. For what . So you can be reliable for the deaths in an earthquake in a project that uses flawed engineering [speaker not understood] . How can you sleep when you know you pushed the mayors agenda in chinatown and north beach just as was done in the bayview and Hunters Point with the tthird . Since the mta has decided to app