Years as a young adult in california, there were two female senators, senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, both elected in 1992 during the socalled year of the woman. I was 9 years old when that happened, too young to grasp what was going on, and not entirely aware of Anita Hill Saga that prompted it so to me it was norm toll look to have washington and see two women representing my state. Completely normal to see one of those women led by bipartisan or to see her lead the Intelligence Committee or see her held to account for egregious wrong doing after 9 11 or see her stand up to the chief to get an apology out of it. It was norm toll watch Dianne Feinstein work in washington, and i know you see this coming, but looking back at the unremarkability is precisely what makes it so remarkable. Wasnt until i came an adult covering politics that i understood how hard she had to fight, sometimes against wings of her own party. Today the flags around the capitol are flying at half staf
root out the communists, marxists, fascists, and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country. the threat from outside forces is far less sinister and grave than the threat from within. calling your political opponents vermin and the threat from within, we ve heard that before. adolph hitler referred today to jews as vermin worthy of eradication. donald trump is following some appalling and notorious footsteps of the most violent dangerous men of the 20th century or at least some of them. and trump didn t end there. here he was in the very same stump speech talking about the home invasion and the brutal attack on speaker nancy pelosi s husband, an attack that was carried out by a rightwing extremist. nancy pelosi was a crazed lunatic. she s a lunatic. she is a crazed lunatic. what the hell was going on with her husband? let s not ask. let s not ask. i withdraw that statement. by the way, she s got a wall around her house. obviously in th
him by someone who may or may not have been in his right mind. another example, which jack smith previewed in his january 6 indictment of trump, that points to this pattern, is that they layout that trump, according to multiple witnesses have privately called sidney powell s election fraud conspiracy theories, quote so this is another brick if the road that jack smith appears to be building toward trying to prove in a court of law that trump was not just leaning on quote/unquote advice of counsel, he was engineering a reality that he perhaps knew was fictitious and wanted to will into existence because he waned to cling to power. glenn, i want to play for you something, because it is not the first time this has come up about rudy giuliani and his drinking. it may be the first time it has it is important to a lot of americans. i want to play for you some testimony before the january 6 select committee and i m going to ask the viewers to listen to
biden sold official favors from daddy, from joe biden. that is bribery. bribery is explicitly enumerated in the constitution is a basis for impeachment. instead of this circus and sideshow of indictment after indictment after indictment of donald trump, i believe the house of representatives needs to move forward with an impeachment inquiry for joe biden. if it s proven that he accepted a bribe, and should be impeached. he should be removed from office. he should be indicted. he should be prosecuted, and he should go to prison. sean: let s get your reaction to this news. nbc reporting that fulton county grand jury has returned ten indictments. we are awaiting the names and the details. we obviously obviously we have to believe one of them would be president donald trump. if i had to render a guess, one has to wonder if rudy giuliani s name would be in there or sidney powell s name or john eastman.
they re saying he had nothing to do with the breach and you cannot attach him to sidney powell s crack pot idea saying that he just admit this breach was a plan? and a crack pot one at that. yeah, it s never great for any defendant when other defendants start pointing fingers. when there s infighting amongst potential defendants, that typically means that one of them could very well cooperate against another or at least that they could have inconsistent defenses which is never good for, you know, any member of the defendant class on that side of the aisle, as it were. so that defense also appears to be rather weak sauce given the reporting, you know, with emails and messages from members of giuliani s team that certainly seem to indicate that the, quote/unquote, mayor was heavily